HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Norton, E. R. Articles by Silvertooth, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Norton, E. R. Articles by Silvertooth, J. C. Agricola Articles by Norton, E. R. Articles by Silvertooth, J. C.

Field Validation of Soil Solute Profiles in Irrigated Cotton

Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721

^* Corresponding author (rnorton{at}ag.arizona.edu).

Management of water and fertilizer N are important aspects of cotton production in the desert Southwest. GOSSYM, a cotton growth simulation model, has been used extensively to manage these inputs. Our objectives were to further validate GOSSYM by comparing model-simulated and measured soil NO^-₃-N profiles, to evaluate GOSSYM's potential as a managementool under irrigated growing conditions in the desert part of the U.S. Cotton Belt, and to address questions about the way GOSSYM simulates NO^-₃-N movement through the soil profile in relation to irrigation water management (which in turn affects prediction of plant growth and development). We compared measured profiles of NO^-₃-N with GOSSYM-simulated profiles. Soil profile samples were obtained from an existing N-management field study, a split-plot within a randomized complete block design. Mainplots were upland and pima cotton (G. hirsutum L. cv. DPL 5415 and G. barbadense L. cv. Pima S-7, respectively). Subplots were a check (0 fertilizer N) and three other N-management strategies. The cotton was grown on a Casa Grande sandy loam [fine-loamy, mixed, hyperthermic Typic Natrargid (reclaimed)] near Maricopa, AZ, in 1994 and 1995. Fertilizer N rates ranged from 0 to 350 kg ha^–1 in 1994 and 0 to 392 kg ha^–1 in 1995. Soil samples taken to a depth of 120 cm in 30-cm increments were analyzed for NO^-₃-N. Comparisons of simulated and actual NO^-₃-N profiles revealed tendencies in GOSSYM to overestimate NO^-₃-N leaching out of the effective rooting zone, resulting in simulated N stresses midseason. When GOSSYM simulated an N stress, between 50 and 75% of the simulated soil NO^-₃-N values were greater than the measured values, yet the simulated N stress still occurred. This indicates possible limitations in GOSSYM's ability to adequately predict N uptake by plants. The dynamic soil N portion of the model needs further refinement, particularly for cotton production under irrigated desert conditions.

Received for publication September 25, 1997.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Yabaji, J. W. Nusz, K. F. Bronson, A. Malapati, J. D. Booker, R. L. Nichols, and T. L. Thompson Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton: Ammonium Thiosulfate, Timing, and Canopy Reflectance Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2009; 73(2): 589 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]