HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brejda, J. J. Articles by Lowry, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brejda, J. J. Articles by Lowry, S. R. Agricola Articles by Brejda, J. J. Articles by Lowry, S. R.

Variation in Eastern Gamagrass Forage Yield with Environments, Harvests, and Nitrogen Rates

USDA-NRCS, Soil Quality Inst., Inst., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 5001;

James R. Brown and Todd E. Lorenz

Dep. of Soil and Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 63343;

Jimmy Henry

Elsberry Plant Materials Ctr., USDA-NRCS, Elsberry, MO 63343;

Stephen R. Lowry

Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc., P.O. Box 1658, Topeka, KS 66601-1658.

^* Corresponding author (brejda{at}nstl.g).

Environmental variation, and the interaction of environment with management practices, can significantly affect perennial forage yields. The objective of this research was to evaluate the importance of environmental main effects and the interaction between environments, N rates, and harvests on eastern gamagrass [Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L.] forage yields. Established eastern gamagrass stands were fertilized with 0, 168, or 336 kg N ha–¹, and harvested three times during the growing season for three consecutive years at two locations in northern Missouri. Year and the year x location interaction were significant environmental sources of variation affecting forage yields. The year main effect had the larger variance component and accounted for 9% of the total variation in forage yields. The harvest main effect and year x harvest interaction had the largest variance components, and together accounted for more than 67% of the total variation in forage yields. Most of the variation between harvests resalted from differences in first-harvest yields, taken at the reproductive growth stage, compared with regrowtharvest yields which were at vegetative growth stages. Variation in precipitation amounts between harvests significantly influenced regrowth harvest yields, causing a significant year x harvest interaction. Forage yield responses to N rates also varied between years, causing a significant year x N rate interaction. Location was not an important source of variation in eastern gamagrass forage yield in this study, nor was there a significant interaction between N rates and harvests. Resultsuggest that supplemental irrigation and longer rest periods between harvests may help improve forage yields and distribution.

Received for publication October 2, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. H. Mashingo, D. W. Kellogg, W. K. Coblentz, and K. S. Anschutz Effect of Harvest Dates on Yield and Nutritive Value of Eastern Gamagrass Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2008; 24(4): 363 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. R. Gibson, E. Z. Aberle, A. D. Knapp, K. J. Moore, and R. Hintz Release of Seed Dormancy in Field Plantings of Eastern Gamagrass Crop Sci., January 31, 2005; 45(2): 494 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Springer, C. L. Dewald, P. L. Sims, and R. L. Gillen How Does Plant Population Density Affect the Forage Yield of Eastern Gamagrass? Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2206 - 2211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Gil and W. H. Fick Soil Nitrogen Mineralization in Mixtures of Eastern Gamagrass with Alfalfa and Red Clover Agron. J., July 1, 2001; 93(4): 902 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]