Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1997
Published in Agron J 89:527-529 (1997)
© 1997 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Everhart, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Everhart, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Everhart, J. R.

Modefying a Carter Flail Forage Harvester to Stabilize the Weighing System

Marvin H. Hall*, Richard F. Todd, Lynn D. Hoffman and James R. Everhart

Dep. of Agronomy, 116 A.S.I. Bldg., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

* Corresponding author (mhh2{at}psu.edu).

The single bending-beam load-cell weigh system that is standard equipment on a Carter flail forage harvester allows the forage collection weigh basket to pitch and sway. This movement can allow some forage to be lost when it is blown past the basket. In addition, this movement requires additional time for the basket to stabilize at the end of each plot before a weight can be recorded. A specialized frame with three bending-beam load cells was designed and constructed to restrict movement of and to support the forage collection weigh basket. Total cost of materials for this modification was about $750. The modifications can be completed with normal shop tools and are readily interfaced with standard equipment on the Carter harvester. The modified support bracket and weigh system performed well, harvesting nearly 10 000 forage plots annually. Compared with the single bending-beam load cell weigh system, the modified support bracket and weigh system reduced pitch and sway of the forage collection weigh basket, was equally precise, and required an average of 7 s less for the basket to stabilize at the end of each plot.


Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for its use by the Pennsylvania State Univ.

Received for publication April 22, 1996.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Agronomy.