HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lauer, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lauer, J. G. Agricola Articles by Lauer, J. G.

Sugar Beet Performance and Interactions with Planting Date, Genotype, and Harvest Date

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1597.

^* Corresponding author (jglauer{at}facstaff.wisc.edu).

Producers and processors have lengthened the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) factory campaign by beginning harvest about 1 mo earlier. Agronomic practices may need to be adjusted to maximize yield and quality of sugar beet harvested earlier. The objective was to describe yield and quality relationships between dates of planting and harvest among 18 sugar beet genotypes. The experiment was conducted at the University of Wyoming Research and Extension Center near Powell, WY, during 1992 and 1993 on a Garland clay loam (fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Haplargids). Treatments consisted of five planting dates between 30 March and 8 June, and four harvest dates every 2 wk beginning 10 September. When averaged across all years, genotypes, and harvest dates, a delay in emergence of 46 d decreased root yield 38% (from 52.5 to 32.3 Mg ha^–1), sugar content 4% (183 to 175 g kg^–1), and recoverable sucrose 42% (9.25 to 5.34 Mg ha^–1). Delaying planting 46 d increased loss to molasses by 21% (7.75 to 9.41 g kg^–1). Root yield varied 18% among sugar beet genotypes (40.9–50.1 Mg ha^–1), sugar content varied 6% (173–185 g kg^–1), loss to molasses varied 13% (7.90–9.10 g kg^–1), and recoverable sucrose varied 14% (7.14–8.33 Mg ha^–1). Over the 43-d harvest period, root yield increased 22% (from 41.1 to 50.2 Mg ha^–1), sugar content 15% (165 to 190 g kg^–1), and recoverable sucrose 45% (6.41 to 9.28 Mg ha^–1). Over the harvest period, loss to molasses decreased 21% (from 9.10 to 7.12 g kg^–1). The relationships for both yield and quality between planting and harvest dates was linear and nearly parallel. Genotypic differences for yield and quality were greatest on early planting dates as compared with later planting dates. Recoverable sucrose ranking of genotypes at the beginning of harvest was similar at the end of harvest. Producers should consider planting high root yield genotypes in early planted fields that are harvested late, thereby taking advantage of the entire growing season, and genotypes with average root yield and above-average sugar content should be used for late planted or early harvested fields.

Received for publication March 18, 1996.