|
|
||||||||
USDA-ARS, 808 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502
Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
USDA-NRCS, 808 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502
USDA-ARS, N. Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267
JM Crop Consulting, Route 1, Box 95, Nickerson, NE 68044
Dep. of Soil, Crop & Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853
Louisiana St. Univ., Northeast Res. Stn., P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Dr., Champaign, IL 61820-7495
Univ. of Missouri, 214 Waters Hall, Columbia, MO 65211
* Corresponding author (kiniry{at}brcsun0.tamu.ed).
Crop models can be evaluated based on accuracy in simulating several years' yields for one location or on accuracy in simulating long-term mean yields for several locations. Our objective was to see how the ALMANAC (Agricultural Land Management Alternatives with Numerical Assessment Criteria) model and a new version of CERES-Maize (Crop-Environment Resource Synthesis) simulate grain yield of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.). We tested the models at one county in each of nine states: Minnesota, New York, Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, Missouri, Kansas, Louisiana, and Texas (MN, NY, IA, IL, NE, MO, KS, LA, and TX). Simulated grain yields were compared with grain yields reported by the National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) for 1983 to 1992. In each county we chose a soil commonly used in maize production, and we used measured weather data. Mean simulated grain yield for each county was always within 5% of the mean measured grain yield for the location. Within locations, measured grain yield was regressed on simulated grain yields and tested to see if the slope was significantly different from 1.0 and if the y-intercept was significantly different from 0.0, both at the 95% confidence level. Only at MN, NY, and NE for ALMANAC and at MN, NY, and TX for CERES was slope significantly different from 1.0 or intercept significantly different from 0.0. The CVs of simulated grain yields were similar to the those of measured yields at most sites. Also, both models were appropriate for predicting an individual year's yield for most counties. Values for plant parameters, such as heat units for development and the harvest index, and values for soil parameters describing soil water-holding capacity offer users reasonable inputs for simulating maize grain yield over a wide range of locations.
Received for publication March 13, 1996.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Causarano, J. N. Shaw, A. J. Franzluebbers, D. W. Reeves, R. L. Raper, K. S. Balkcom, M. L. Norfleet, and R. C. Izaurralde Simulating Field-Scale Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics Using EPIC Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 8, 2007; 71(4): 1174 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Kiniry, B. L. Burson, G. W. Evers, J. R. Williams, H. Sanchez, C. Wade, J. W. Featherston, and J. Greenwade Coastal Bermudagrass, Bahiagrass, and Native Range Simulation at Diverse Sites in Texas Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 450 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yang, A. Dobermann, K. G. Cassman, and D. T. Walters Features, Applications, and Limitations of the Hybrid-Maize Simulation Model Agron. J., May 3, 2006; 98(3): 737 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Miao, D. J. Mulla, W. D. Batchelor, J. O. Paz, P. C. Robert, and M. Wiebers Evaluating Management Zone Optimal Nitrogen Rates with a Crop Growth Model Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 545 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Saseendran, L. Ma, D. C. Nielsen, M. F. Vigil, and L. R. Ahuja Simulating Planting Date Effects on Corn Production Using RZWQM and CERES-Maize Models Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 58 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Andales, L. R. Ahuja, and G. A. Peterson Evaluation of GPFARM for Dryland Cropping Systems in Eastern Colorado Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1510 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Carbone, L. O. Mearns, T. Mavromatis, E. J. Sadler, and D. Stooksbury Evaluating CROPGRO-Soybean Performance for Use in Climate Impact Studies Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 537 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Andrade, L. Echarte, R. Rizzalli, A. Della Maggiora, and M. Casanovas Kernel Number Prediction in Maize under Nitrogen or Water Stress Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1173 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Andresen, G. Alagarswamy, C. A. Rotz, J. T. Ritchie, and A. W. LeBaron Weather Impacts on Maize, Soybean, and Alfalfa Production in the Great Lakes Region, 1895-1996 Agron. J., September 1, 2001; 93(5): 1059 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xie, J. R. Kiniry, V. Nedbalek, and W. D. Rosenthal Maize and Sorghum Simulations with CERES-Maize, SORKAM, and ALMANAC under Water-Limiting Conditions Agron. J., September 1, 2001; 93(5): 1148 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R.C. Vega, F. H. Andrade, V. O. Sadras, S. A. Uhart, and O. R. Valentinuz Seed Number as a Function of Growth. A Comparative Study in Soybean, Sunflower, and Maize Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 748 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Rasse, J. T. Ritchie, W. W. Wilhelm, J. Wei, and E. C. Martin Simulating Inbred-Maize Yields with CERES-IM Agron. J., July 1, 2000; 92(4): 672 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kobayashi and M. U. Salam Comparing Simulated and Measured Values Using Mean Squared Deviation and its Components Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 345 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||