HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pannkuk, C. D. Articles by Saxton, K. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pannkuk, C. D. Articles by Saxton, K. E. Agricola Articles by Pannkuk, C. D. Articles by Saxton, K. E.

Fallow Management Effects on Soil Water Storage and Wheat Yields in the Pacific Northwest

Dep. of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164.
Dep. of Crops and Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164.
USDA-ARS and Dep. of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164.

^* Corresponding author (pannkuk{at}wsu.edu).

Conservation tillage practices are adopted by farmers to control soil erosion and in some cases to reduce production costs. Conventional tillage practices usually rely on extensive tillage to control weeds and conserve water. In other cases, grazing animals may be used to control weeds and utilize crop residues for animal fodder on the fallowed land. These intensive systems leave the soil surface bare and susceptible to erosion. A five-year study was conducted in the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)-fallow area of eastern Washington to evaluate the effects of tillage, weed control, and residue management on soil water storage and wheat yields. Tillage treatments were (i) conventional (early spring sweep and summer cultivation), (ii) delayed spring (late spring sweep and chemical weed control), and (iii) no-till (chemical fallow). Residue management treatments were (i) all residues removed at the beginning of the 22-mo fallow, (ii) all residues and vegetation removed after the first winter rainy season, and (iii) residues not removed. Weed control treatments were (i) weeds not controlled during the first winter rainy season but controlled thereafter and (ii) weeds controlled throughout the fallow period. Soil water storage was greater every year where crop residues were not removed, or removed after the first winter of the fallow period, compared with residue removal at the beginning of the 22-mo fallow. Weedy fallow (weeds allowed to grow during the first winter rainy season) had no effect on fallow efficiency or wheat yields compared with fallow with weed control. Wheat yields were increased in one year out of five by the retention of surface residues and in one year by tillage and, thus, for the most part did not reflect differences in water storage efficiencies. Weedy fallow provided greater residue cover through erosive periods, but did not adversely affect soil water storage and wheat yields compared with fallow with weed control.

Received for publication August 15, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Smith, K. K. Kidwell, M. A. Evans, R. J. Cook, and R. W. Smiley Assessment of Spring Wheat Genotypes for Disease Reaction to Rhizoctonia solani AG-8 in Controlled Environment and Direct-Seeded Field Evaluations Crop Sci., March 1, 2003; 43(2): 694 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W. Donald Timing and Frequency of Between-Row Mowing and Band-Applied Herbicide for Annual Weed Control in Soybean Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 1013 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. D. Halvorson, A. L. Black, J. M. Krupinsky, S. D. Merrill, B. J. Wienhold, and D. L. Tanaka Spring Wheat Response to Tillage System and Nitrogen Fertilization within a Crop-Fallow System Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 288 - 294. [Abstract] [Full Text]