HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Darusman, Articles by Lamm, F. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Darusman, Articles by Lamm, F. R. Agricola Articles by Darusman, Articles by Lamm, F. R.

Water Flux Below the Root Zone vs. Irrigation Amount in Drip-Irrigated Corn

Faculty of Agric. Syiah Kuala Univ., Univ., Darussalam, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
Dep. of Agronomy, Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501

William E. Spurgeon and Freddie R. Lamm

Spurgeon, Southwest Res. & Ext. Ctr., Garden City, City, KS 67846-9132
Northwest Res. & Ext. Ctr., Colby, KS 67701-0830 Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn.

^* Corresponding author (lrstone{at}ksu.ksu.edu).

With increasing demands on water resources, greater efficiency is needed in irrigated agriculture. Internal drainage from the root zone is a loss that can be reduced or managed to improve irrigation efficiency. Our objective was to determine the relationship between seasonal water flux below the root zone (1.5 m) and irrigation amount with corn (Zea mays L.). Subsurface drip irrigation systems near Colby and Holcomb, KS, were used to supply water. Driplines were buried at a soil depth of 0.40 to 0.45 m, with a spacing of 1.5 m. The two soils are deep silt Ioams that formed in loess. Water flux at the 1.5-m soil depth was determined in four irrigation treatments during 1990 and 1991. Tensiometers were placed at soil depths of 1.4 and 1.7 m and at distances from the dripline of 0, 0.4, and 0.8 m. Water flux was calculated using predetermined hydraulic conductivity vs. matric potential (m) relationships, m data from tensiometers within the corn plots, and Darcy's equation of water flow. Irrigation was applied to four treatmentsuch that irrigation plus rain equaled 125, 100, 75, and 50% of calculated corn evapotranspiration (ET). From a regression analysis relating integrated water flux below the root zone (1.5 m) and in-season irrigation, net upward water flux occurred with in-season irrigation < 296 mm (RMSE = 71 mm), whereas net downward water flux occurred with irrigation > 296 mm. Compared with the 100% ET treatment (full irrigation), the 75% ET treatment had 76% of the in-season irrigation, 25% of the in-season water flux (net downward) below the root zone (1.5 m), and 93% of the grain yield. Near-maximum corn grain yields can be obtained with significant decreases in irrigation amount and internal drainage from the root zone compared with full irrigation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Gehl, J. P. Schmidt, L. R. Stone, A. J. Schlegel, and G. A. Clark In Situ Measurements of Nitrate Leaching Implicate Poor Nitrogen and Irrigation Management on Sandy Soils J. Environ. Qual., November 7, 2005; 34(6): 2243 - 2254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Assouline, S. Cohen, D. Meerbach, T. Harodi, and M. Rosner Microdrip Irrigation of Field Crops: Effect on Yield, Water Uptake, and Drainage in Sweet Corn Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 228 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Norwood Water Use and Yield of Limited-Irrigated and Dryland Corn Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text]