HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Board, J. E. Articles by Boethel, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Board, J. E. Articles by Boethel, D. J. Agricola Articles by Board, J. E. Articles by Boethel, D. J.

Critical Light Interception during Seed Filling for Insecticide Application and Optimum Soybean Grain Yield

Dep. Agronomy Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., LSU Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Dep. of Entomology, Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., LSU Agric. Ctr., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., LSU Agric. Ctr.,

^* Corresponding author (jboard{at}agctr.lsu.edu).

Relationships between defoliation, light interception, and grain yield for soybean [Glycine max (L) Merr.] during the last half the seed filling period are not fully understood. Because defoliating insect pests in the southeastern USA frequently attack soybean during this period, knowledge of such relationships would aid development of criteria for economic insecticide application. Our first objective was to determine the efficacy of using light interception and leaf area index as criteria for economic insecticide application to manage defoliating insect pests. The second objective was to determine the effects of partial and total defoliations during seed filling on grain yield and grain yield formation. ‘Centennial’ soybean (Maturity Group VI) was planted in 1993 and 1994 near St. Gabriel, LA. Experimental design was a randomized complete block in a split-plot arrangement. Main plots were the temporal midpoint and 3/4-point seed-filling stages. Split plots were four defoliation treatments: 0% leaf removal (control), 37 to 41% leaf removal, 56 to 61% leaf removal, and 100% leaf removal. At the temporal midpoint, grain yield declined linearly as light interception fell from 93 to 50%. Thus, for a crop achieving near-maximal light interception, insecticide application would be recommended whenever light interception at the midpoint seed-filling stage fell below 93%. Yield and light interception were not closely related at the 3/4-point seed-filling stage. Maintenance of maximal grain yield (yield at 0% defoliation) required retention of at least 39% of the leaf area at this time. In conclusion, light interception potentially could be used as an insecticide application criterion at midpoint seed-filling stage, but not the 3/4-point. Partial defoliation at the midpoint will affect grain yield if it reduces light interception below 93%, whereas at the 3/4-point total defoliation is required to affect grain yield.

Received for publication June 3, 1996.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kumudini, C. V. Godoy, J. E. Board, J. Omielan, and M. Tollenaar Mechanisms Involved in Soybean Rust-Induced Yield Reduction Crop Sci., November 24, 2008; 48(6): 2334 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Board, V. Maka, R. Price, D. Knight, and M. E. Baur Development of Vegetation Indices for Identifying Insect Infestations in Soybean Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 650 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Board Soybean Cultivar Differences on Light Interception and Leaf Area Index during Seed Filling Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Malone, D. A. Herbert Jr., and D. L. Holshouser Evaluation of the LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer to Estimate Leaf Area in Manually Defoliated Soybean Agron. J., September 1, 2002; 94(5): 1012 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Nelson and K. A. Renner Soybean Growth and Development as Affected by Glyphosate and Postemergence Herbicide Tank Mixtures Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]