Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1997
Published in Agron J 89:257-262 (1997)
© 1997 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomkins, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shipe, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tomkins, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shipe, E. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tomkins, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shipe, E. R.

Environmental Adaptation of Long-Juvenile Soybean Cultivars and Elite Strains

Jeffrey P. Tomkins and Emerson R. Shipe*

Dep. of Agronomy, Box 340359, Poole Agric. Bldg., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359

* Corresponding author (eshipe{at}clemson.edu).

A long-juvenile (LJ) trait that delays flowering under short-day conditions has been incorporated into adapted soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] germplasm. Little is known about the performance of recently developed LJ cultivars and elite strains as influenced by planting systems typical of the southeastern USA. Therefore, a field study was undertaken using two LJ cultivars and four elite LJ Florida strains at Blackville and Pendleton, SC. Planting dates were early (late April), normal (late May), and late (late June), in 1993 1994. The LJ genotypes exhibited neither genotype x planting date nor genotype x location interactions for seed yield or seed quality, indicating consistency of genotype performance across environments. Although variation among LJ genotypes for yield was not detected, all four elite strains all ranked higher in yield than the two cuitivars. Maturity varied among LJ genotypes but seed yield did not, indicating the possibility of developing LJ genotypes that have relatively short life cycles and high seed yield. Additionally, LJ genotypes were compared with two conventional cultivars: Maturity Groups (MG) IV, and VI at early plantings; MG V, VI, and VII at normal plantings; and MG VI, VH, and VIII at late plantings. As planting date was delayed, growth and agronomic responses of LJ genotypes became similar to those of successively later conventional cnitivars. The LJ genotypes were similar in yield to conventional cultivars in maturity groups V to VIII across planting dates, but had 56% higher yields than MG IV cultivars at the early planting. Seed quality ratings of LJ genotypes were 54 and 23% better than MG IV and V cuitivars, respectively, at the early planting. In general, LJ genotypes showed superior photoperiodic adaptation to different planting date environments.


Technical Contribution no. 4193 of the South Carolina Agric. Exp. Stn. Research supported by state and Hatch funds allocated to the South Carolina Agric. Exp. Stn. and by grants from the South Carolina Soybean Board.

Received for publication May 23, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. R. Adams, S. Pearson, and P. Hadley
Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity
J. Exp. Bot., April 15, 2001; 52(357): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Agronomy.