|
|
||||||||
Crop Sci. Dep., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501
Dep. of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501
Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501
* Corresponding author (rheinig{at}plymouth.ces.ncsu.edu).
The adaptability of grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] complicates decision making regarding the replacement of damaged stands. Our objective was to construct replanting guidelines for a broad range of situations by using a sorghum growth model to project yields for both original and replanted stands. Sorghum yields were simulated for 33 seasons for every combination of seven planting dates, six plant populations, and three hybrid maturity classes at three Kansas sites representative of Midwest sorghum producing areas. The outputs were tabulated to obtain yield distributions for both original and replanted crops. Net returns for replanting were calculated from yield differences, input costs, and harvest prices. Increases in both mean yields and net returns were associated with greater variability. The choices of replant timing, hybrid maturity, and planting density therefore depend on the grower's risk preferences. In western Kansas, an area with soils and climate representative of most of the Great Plains, risk-neutral producers should replant with an early-maturity hybrid at 50 000 plants ha–1 if the original population declines to less than 20 000 plants ha–1. In eastern Kansas, an area representing western Corn Belt sorghum production, replanting with a medium-maturity hybrid at 200 000 plants ha–1 is a good option when a medium- or late-maturity hybrid falls below 20 000 plants ha–1 or an early hybrid drops beneath 100 000 plants ha–1.
Received for publication September 22, 1994.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Baumhardt, J. A. Tolk, and S. R. Winter Seeding Practices and Cultivar Maturity Effects on Simulated Dryland Grain Sorghum Yield Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 935 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Staggenborg and R. L. Vanderlip Crop Simulation Models Can be Used as Dryland Cropping Systems Research Tools Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 378 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Goodin, J.M.S. Hutchinson, R. L. Vanderlip, and M.C. Knapp Estimating Solar Irradiance for Crop Modeling Using Daily Air Temperature Data Agron. J., September 1, 1999; 91(5): 845 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||