Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1997
Published in Agron J 89:100-103 (1997)
© 1997 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lanning, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lanning, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, P. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lanning, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, P. L.

Genotype of Wheat and Barley Affects Light Penetration and Wild Oat Growth

Susan P. Lanning, Luther E. Talbert*, John M. Martin, Thomas K. Blake and Philip L. Bruckner

Plant, Soils, and Environmental Sciences Dep., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717

* Corresponding author (usslt{at}msu.oscs.montana.edu).

Cereal breeders have selected for traits that confer resistance to diseases and insects, with the goal of stabilizing yield potential and reducing inputs. The possibility exists that, by selecting for growth habits that impede weed development, cultivars can be developed with increased tolerance to weed infestations. Our objective was to determine whether wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lines differ in their ability to prevent penetration of light into interrow spaces and suppress wild oat (Avena fatua L.) growth. Based on our results, significant genotypic variation exists within winter and spring wheat and spring barley for the amount of sunlight allowed to penetrate to interrow spaces. A negative correlation existed between height and light penetration in four of seven nurseries studied. Six barley lines and six spring wheat lines, of similar heights but allowing different amounts of light penetration, were tested for suppression of wild oat growth. Barley was a much better competitor with wild oat than wheat was, allowing approximately one-half the wild oat biomass and seed production. Barley lines allowed approximately 43% less light penetration than wheat. Significant variation for wild oat growth variables also existed among lines within the crops. High positive correlations of light penetration with wild oat growth existed within barley, suggesting that lines may be selected to contribute to integrated wild oat management.


Journal Series No. J-4098 of the Montana Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication March 4, 1996.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
V. Carollo, D. E. Matthews, G. R. Lazo, T. K. Blake, D. D. Hummel, N. Lui, D. L. Hane, and O. D. Anderson
GrainGenes 2.0. An Improved Resource for the Small-Grains Community
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2005; 139(2): 643 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Agronomy.