Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1995
Published in Agron J 87:1221-1225 (1995)
© 1995 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tollenaar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tollenaar, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tollenaar, M.

Changes in Maize Hybrid Photosynthetic Response to Leaf Nitrogen, from Pre-Anthesis to Grain Fill

Lianne M. Dwyer* and Anne M. Anderson

Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Ctr. for Land and Biological Resources Res. (CLBRR), Ottawa, ON KIA OC6, Canada
Univ. of Guelph, ON NIG 2W1

Douglas W. Stewart and B. L. Ma

Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Ctr. for Land and Biological Resources Res. (CLBRR), Ottawa, ON KIA OC6, Canada

Matthijs Tollenaar

Univ. of Guelph, ON NIG 2W1, Canada

* Corresponding author (Email: dwyerl{at}ncccot.agr.ca).

Improvement of nitrogen use efficiency in maize production requires quantifying genotypic variability in response to soil N. The objective of this field study was to quantify the relationship between leaf N concentration and leaf photosynthetic rate from pre-anthesis to grain fill for six maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Maize hybrids were grown at the Central Experimental Farm at Ottawa in Ontario (45°23' N, 75°43' W) in 1991, 1992, and 1993 at three N fertilizer rates (0, 100, and 200 kg N ha–1). A method of analysis was developed to relate leaf photosynthesis measurements at comparable irradiance levels to leaf N concentration measurements. Photosynthetic response to leaf N was characterized by two fitted coefficients, N0, threshold leaf N concentration for photosynthesis, and P3, photosynthetic rate at high (30 g N kg–1 dry weight) leaf N concentration. There were no hybrid differences in N0 (P > 0.05). There were differences in P3, notably a significantly lower P3 value at anthesis for an old hybrid compared with recent commercial hybrids. In 1992, a recent commercial hybrid, Pioneer 3902, had the highest P3 value, the second highest crop growth rate (CGR) and the highest grain yield, but hybrid differences in P3 were not generally correlated with CGR or grain yield (P > 0.05). Growth stage had a significant effect on both N0 and P3; both declined at later growth stages (P ≤ 0.05). The decline in P3 was greatest in Pride 5 in 1993. Photosynthate production during grain fill was potentially limited in all hybrids by a decline in P3 as the season progressed, although the degree of decline varied with year and hybrid. This analysis quantified the relationships between leaf N concentration and leaf photosynthetic rate for different growth stages and hybrids for evaluation of hybrid N use efficiency.


CLBRR Contribution no. 94-56.

Received for publication May 27, 1994.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Stewart, C. Costa, L. M. Dwyer, D. L. Smith, R. I. Hamilton, and B. L. Ma
Canopy Structure, Light Interception, and Photosynthesis in Maize
Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1465 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Agronomy.