Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1995
Published in Agron J 87:70-75 (1995)
© 1995 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Acock, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Acock, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Acock, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, G. W.

A Simple Conductimetric CO2 Analyzer with Automatic Recalibration: I. Design, Implementation, and Functionality

Basil Acock* and Gerard W. Wall*

USDA-ARS Systems Res. Lab., Natural Resources Inst., BARC-W, Baltsville, MD 20705
USDA-ARS, U.S. Water Conservation Lab., 4331 E. Broadway, Phoenix, AZ 85040

* Corresponding author.

Controlled-environment plant growth cabinets may be used to investigate the long-term effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) on plant growth. Infrared gas analyzers (IRGAs) are normally used to monitor and control [CO2] in plant cabinets. With many cabinets in use, however, it soon becomes impractical to purchase an individual IRGA for each cabinet. A more economical method of monitoring and controlling [CO2] relies on the change in electrical conductivity when CO2 is dissolved in demineralized water. This work describes the design, implementation, and functionality of an inexpensive conductimetric system for controlling [CO2] in plant growth cabinets. Regressing electrical conductivity against [CO2] over the range 0 to 1000 µL L –l yields a quadratic response. Calibration drift inherent in the conductimetric CO2 analyzer requires that each analyzer be recalibrated periodically. Automatically recalibrating with an IRGA every 900 s gave control of the [CO2] within the plant enclosures to within 10 to 15 üL L–1 of the set point. The [CO2] control system is robust enough to maintain this accuracy regardless of the desired [CO2] set point or the mass of plant material within the plant growth cabinet. In this approach, only one IRGA is required to control [CO2] in many plant growth cabinets if each cabinet has a dedicated conductimetric CO2 analyzer.


Contribution of the USDA-ARS (Systems Res. Lab, Beltsville, and Crop Simulation Res. Unit, Mississippi State)

Received for publication January 27, 1993.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Agronomy.