Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1993
Published in Agron J 85:1009-1013 (1993)
© 1993 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, M. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, M. D.

Pearl Millet-Soybean Rotation and Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects on Millet Productivity

M. S. Mohammed and M. D. Clegg*

Dep. of Agronomy, 102B KCR, University of Nebraska, Lincoln NE6 8583-0817

* Corresponding author

Pearl Millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] plays an important role as a staple food grain in many developing countries, but is relatively new to the Great Plains of the USA. This study was conducted for 2 yr to evaluate the effects of a preceding soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] crop and/or applied N fertilizer on pearl millet yield and N uptake and to quantify the amount of residual soil NO3N resulting from the cropping system. The experiment was conducted on a fine montmorillonitic mesic, Typic Argiudoll soil at the University of Nebraska Research Center near Mead, NE. The experiment included three treatments consisting of 0, 45, and 90 kg N ha–1 applied to continuous pearl millet, and two treatments consisting of 0 and 45 kg N h–1 applied to pearl millet following soybean. Pearl millet grain yield was 5.69 (1986) and 4.22 (1987) Mg–1 with no applied N, 6.42 (1986) and 5.82 (1987) Mg–1 with 45kg ha–1 applied N, and 7.13 (1986) and 6.85 (1987) Mg–1 with 90kg ha–1 applied N. Grian yields increased 0.73 (1986) and 1.48 (1987) Mg –1 when grown after soybeans, yield increase equivalent to that with 45 kg ha–1 of applied N. Percent N in various plant parts and N uptake increased with applied N or when pearl millet followed soybean Differences in pearl millet plant weight, leaf weight, and LAI did not occury until 62 d after sowing in plots with applied N , but an increase in these parameters due to rotation occurred at 37 d. Residua NO3 in the soil profile was higher in the rotation treatment than the applied N treatments, but there was a tendency for more residualN O3-N to Occur with increased applied N in the continuous pearl millet. Pearl millet can be successfully used in croppins systems with soybean wth no additional N, but addition of N may be necessary with continuous cropping.


Contribution of the Nebraska Agric. Res. Div. Nebraska Journal no. 10002. Work supported in part by a grant from the International Sorghum/Millet Collaborative Research Program (CRSP), USAID, under Grant no. DAN-1254-G-SS-5065-00

Received for publication July 13, 1992.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. A. Ennin and M. D. Clegg
Effect of Soybean Plant Populations in a Soybean and Maize Rotation
Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 396 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Agronomy.