HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ball-Coelho, B. Articles by Sampaio, E. V. S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ball-Coelho, B. Articles by Sampaio, E. V. S. B. Agricola Articles by Ball-Coelho, B. Articles by Sampaio, E. V. S. B.

Residue Management Effects on Sugarcane Yield and Soil Properties in Northeastern Brazil

Ball Farm Services, Ltd., 734 Talbot St. West, Aylmer, ON, N5H 2V1, Canada

H. Tiessen and J. W. B. Stewart

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W0, Canada

I. H. Salcedo and E. V. S. B. Sampaio

Dep. Energia Nuclear, Univ. Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

^* Corresponding author

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) production systems commonly include preharvest or postharvest burning to dispose of residue. In northeastern Brazil, no-burn mulching practices are being introduced as a labor-intensive but environmentally more friendly alternative. We examined the effect of burning crop residues on sugarcane yield and C, N, and P cycles. Carbon, N, and P losses during preharvest burning were measured for a sugarcane first ratoon crop. Postharvest burn and mulch treatments were compared for a plant crop grown on an Oxic Haplustult soil. During the preharvest burn of the first ratoon crop, 2600 kg C ha^–1, 17 kg N ha^–1 and 1 kg P ha^–1 were lost by convection. The postharvest burn of the plant crop residue resulted in losses of 4800 kg C ha^–1 and 42 kg N ha^–1; P losses were undetectable in the burn. The postharvest burn of the plant crop residue had no significant effect on total C or NH₄-N plus organic N in soil during the first ratoon crop cycle. Soil pH in the top 7.5 cm layer of soil did not change after the postharvest burn but increased 1.1 units in the top l-cm layer. In the unburned mulch treatment the litter layer did not reduce tillering or N and P uptake. Harvestable cane yield of the first ratoon crop was 17 Mg ha^–1 (wet wt.) greater in the mulch than the burn treatment (54 vs. 37 Mg ha^–1). This yield response was attributed to increased soil water retention and reduced weed growth under the mulch. In this short-term trial, mulhing proved to be an alternative to the traditional burn system.

Received for publication August 14, 1992.