Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1991
Published in Agron J 83:386-390 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, A. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, A. E.

Sugarbeet Response to Subsoiling and Wheel Traffic

B. S. Johnson* and A. E. Erickson

Dep. of Crop & Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824-1325

* Corresponding author.

Normal tillage practices often create poor physical conditions for crop growth on lake plain soils in Michigan. Tillage studies were conducted in 1983 on Parkhill loam (fine-loamy, mixed, nonacidic, mesic Mollic Haplaquept) and from 1983 to 1985 on Charity clay (fine, illitic (calcareous), mesic Aerie Haplaquept) to evaluate the potential for increasing sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield by reducing the physical limitations of these soils. Treatments consisted of eight combinations of a primary tillage and secondary tillage variable. Primary tillage was applied in the fall and consisted of subsoiling and moldboard plowing (SMP), subsoiling and shallow chiseling (SCH), moldboard plowing (MP), or shallow chiseling (CH). The secondary tillage vairable consisted of the presence or absence of tractor wheel traffic occurring during seedbed preparation. Response of sugarbeet ‘US-H20’ and ‘US-H23’ was evident each year and was attributed in part to improved soil aeration where subsoiling was performed and where wheel traffic was absent. Response was greatest in 1983 when subsoiling increased root yield of US-H20 by 10.7 Mg ha–1 on Parkhill loam and by 7.6 Mg ha–1 on Charity clay. Elimination of preplant wheel traffic increased root yields by an average of 8.3 Mg ha–1 on Charity clay that year. Recoverable sucrose yield was affected in proportion to root yield each year because tillage had no effect on recoverable sucrose concentration. The need to minimize wheel traffic in sugarbeet production systems, regardless of the primary tillage practices employed, was evidenced by results of this study.


Contribution of the Michigan Agr. Exp. Stn.; partially supported by a grant from the USDA-ARS.

Received for publication November 9, 1989.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Agronomy.