Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1988
Published in Agron J 80:751-755 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Temple, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Temple, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Temple, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, K.

Injury and Yield Responses of Differentially Irrigated Cotton to Ozone

P. J. Temple*, R. S. Kupper, R. W. Lennox and K. Rohr

Statewide Air Pollution Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

* Corresponding author.

The hypothesis that plants subjected to drought stress should be less susceptible to air pollution than well-watered plants has not been adequately tested in the field. This study was conducted to determine the influence of drought stress on foliar injury and yield responses of field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Acala SJ-2) to O3. Cotton grown on Hanford coarse sandy loam (coarse-loamy, mixed, non-acidic, thermic Typic Xerorthents) at three levels of soil water in open-top chambers was exposed to seasonal 12-h (0900-2100 h) O3 concentrations of 0.015, 0.074, 0.094 and 0.111 µL L–1 in Riverside, CA. At ambient O3 concentrations (0.074 µL L–1) severely drought-stressed (SS) cotton averaged 25% foliar injury, while moderately stressed (SO) plants averaged 56%, and optimally watered (OW) plants averaged 68% foliar injury. Lint and seed yields were significantly reduced by O3 in OW and SO plots, while SS cotton showed no yield reductions, except at 0.111 µL L–1. Yield reductions were primarily attributable to fewer numbers of bolls. Regression equations for lint yield in relation to seasonal 12-h O3 means and total seasonal irrigation predicted yield losses at ambient O3 concentrations relative to a background O3 level of 0.025 µL L–1 of 26.2% for OW, 19.8% for SO, and 4.7% for SS cotton. The relative similarity in responses of OW and SO cotton was attributed to adaptation to drought stress by SO plants, which maintained the sensitivity of moderately stressed cotton to O3. These results suggest that low or moderate drought stress would have relatively little effect on the response of irrigated cotton to O3.


Contribution from the Statewide Air Pollution Res. Ctr., Univ. of California-Riverside.

Received for publication September 3, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Agronomy.