|
|
||||||||
The use of 15N techniques allows for the quantitative evaluation of N2 fixation and distribution and their impact on the N balance in various soil-plant systems. The A-value approach was used in this investigation to assess N2 fixed at various growth stages in fieldgrown soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cv. Chippewa in a Typic Eutrocrepts soil. At physiological maturity (R7), the amount of N derived from fixation (Ndfs) was 102 kg/ha, equivalent to 47% of total N assimilated, while the contributions from soil (Ndfs) and 15N-labelled fertilizer (Ndff) accounted for 50 and 3%, respectively. Up to growth stage V6, which occupied half of the total duration of growth, Ndfa was less than 5% of N2 fixed by physiological maturity. A rapid increase in Ndfa occurred from R1 onwards, and during the reproductive stages (Rl-R4), which spanned less than one-third of the total duration of growth, this represented about 45% of total Ndfa. An almost equal portion of N (approximately 43%) was fixed from pod-filling (R5) to physiological maturity (R7), a period slightly more than one-fifth of the total duration of growth. Therefore, substantial N2 fixation occurred during periods of active sink development and contributed more than 65% of the plant's N accrued during pod fill (R3-R7). Nitrogen assimilated between R3 and R7 (when N2 fixation was high) seemed to be the predominant source of N for pod development. Thus there was a greater contribution from fixed N (55%) than soil N (43%) in pods and seeds at the end of R7. After grain removal, it was estimated that the growth of cv. Chippewa in this soil led to a net soil depletion of 54 kg N/ha.
Key Words: Nitrogen assimilation Nitrogen partitioning Soybean isolines Glycine max (L.) Merrill
2 Scientific officer, IAEA Agric. pb., Seibersdorf, Austria; scientific officer, Joint FAO/IAEA Division, A-1400 Vienna, Austria; scientific officer, IAEA Agric. Lab., Seibersdorf. Austria: consultant, Natl. Academy of Sci., Washington, DC.
Received for publication January 21, 1986.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Kaye, S. C. Mason, T. D. Galusha, and M. Mamo Nodulating and Non-Nodulating Soybean Rotation Influence on Soil Nitrate-Nitrogen and Water, and Sorghum Yield Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 599 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Ennin and M. D. Clegg Effect of Soybean Plant Populations in a Soybean and Maize Rotation Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 396 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||