Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1986
Published in Agron J 78:86-90 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hulugalle, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hulugalle, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hulugalle, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, R.

Soil Water Balance of Intercropped Maize and Cowpea Grown in a Tropical Hydromorphic Soil in Western Nigeria1

N. R. Hulugalle and R. Lal2

Water-use efficiency (WUE) and soil water extraction by four maize (Zea mays L.)/cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.) cropping patterns were studied in a tropical hydromorphic soil over two consecutive growing seasons in 1983 and 1984. The cropping patterns used were: monocropped cowpea (T1), monocropped maize (T2, intercropped maize and cowpea planted in the same row as alternate plants (T3), and intercropped maize and cowpea planted in alternate rows (T4). Evapotranspiration (E3) was calculated from the soil water balance. Soil water extraction was limited to the surface 0.35 m of the profile due to the restriction of roots by a gravel layer at this depth. Upward water flux into the root zone was negligible due to low hydraulic conductivity. All cropping patterns were subjected to drought stress in 1983. Mean runoff and net water flux in the root zone in 1983 and 1984 were 2.4 and 0.04%, respectively, and 1.4 and 0.4%, respectively, of the seasonal rainfall. Intercropping increased seasonal WUE. The WUE (kg grain per mm water per ha) of T2, T2, T3, and T4 were 0.5, 2.2, 1.6, and 1.6, respectively, for the droughty conditions in 1983 and were 2.1, 2.1, 4.2, and 3.6, respectively, for the favorable moisture regime in 1984. One of the benefits of intercropping maize and cowpea is, therefore, a higher WUE in relation to monocropping provided soil water is not limiting

Key Words: Intercropping • Soil water extraction • Wateruse efficiency • Zea mays L. • Vigna unguiculata Walp


1 Contribution from Farming Systems Program, Int. Inst. of Trop. Agric., PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria

2 Soil physicists, Farming Systems Program, Int. Inst. of Trop. Agric.

Present address of the senior author is: Soil-water Management Agronomist, IITA/SAFGRAD Project, B.P. 1783, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Fasso.

Received for publication January 10, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Agronomy.