HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barnett, F. L. Articles by Posler, G. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Barnett, F. L. Articles by Posler, G. L. Agricola Articles by Barnett, F. L. Articles by Posler, G. L.

Performance of Cool–Season Perennial Grasses in Pure Stands and in Mixtures with Legumes¹

Clarification of relationships among species in mixed stands is essential to enlightened management of forage mixtures. During 1976–1979, we evaluated several grass–legume mixtures in a field study in eastern Kansas. Grasses were: commercial smooth brome, Bromus inermis Leyss.; ‘Regar’ Turkish brome, B. biebersteinii Roem. &Schult.; ‘Kentucky 31’ tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Scbreb.; and ‘Ioreed’ reed canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea L. Legumes were: ‘Kanza’ alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.; ‘Kenstar’ red clover, Trifolium pratense L.; ‘Dawn’ birdsfoot trefoil, Lotus corniculatus L.; and ‘Emerald’ crownvetch, Coronilla varia L. Each grass was grown in a two–species mixture with each legume, and in a pure stand with 0 and 90 kg N ha–¹ as NH₄NO₃. Mixtures were obtained by alternating all–grass and all–legume drill rows. Legumes were grown in pure stands in an adjacent planting. Both plantings were on a Woodson silt loam of the fine, mixed, thermic family in the Abruptic Argiaquolls subgroup of the Mollisols. Dry matter (DM) yields were obtained from all plots. Proportion of grass in mixtures was determined from hand–harvested samples. Dry matter yield of the grass component of each mixture was computed as the product of the DM yield of the whole stand and the proportion of grass in the mixture. Crude protein (CP) contents of whole stands and grass components of mixtures were computed as 6.25 times N. Although comparisons varied across years, mixtures averaged as much grass DM (3.21 Mg ha–¹) as unfertilized all–grass stands (3.07 Mg ha–¹) during the 4–year period. Crude–protein contents of grass components of mixtures consistently ranked above those of unfertilized all–grass stands; differences usually were significant (P < 0.05) but varied in magnitude with year and type of stand. Legumes differed significantly (P < 0.05) every year in DM yield and every year except 1979 in CP content. Over the 4–year period, however, no legume was clearly superior in either variable.

Key Words: Bromus inermis Leyss. • B. biebersteinii Roem. & Schult. • Festuca arundinacea Schreb. • Phalaris arundinacea L. • Medicago sativa L. • Trifolium pratense L. • Lotus corniculatus L. • Coronilla varia L. • Dry matter yield • Crude protein content • Stand dynamics

² Forage research geneticist and forage utilization research agronomist, Agronomy Dep., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506.

Received for publication February 22, 1982.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Zemenchik, K. A. Albrecht, and R. D. Shaver Improved Nutritive Value of Kura Clover- and Birdsfoot Trefoil-Grass Mixtures Compared with Grass Monocultures Agron. J., September 1, 2002; 94(5): 1131 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Zemenchik, K. A. Albrecht, and M. K. Schultz Nitrogen Replacement Values of Kura Clover and Birdsfoot Trefoil in Mixtures with Cool-Season Grasses Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 451 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]