Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1982
Published in Agron J 74:893-898 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, M. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kirkham, M. B.

Orientation of Leaves of Winter Wheat Planted in North-South or East-West Rows1

M. B. Kirkham2

The objective of the present experiment was to determine if, and to what extent, leaves of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.), oriented in two row directions, received different amounts of light. At times distributed over two growing seasons, including fall, winter, and spring months, values of I/IO (intensity of received direct-beam radiation to incident direct-beam radiation) were calculated from solar-noon sun angles for leaves of winter wheat (cv. ‘Osage’), planted in north-south (NS) and east-west (EW) rows. Another objective of this research was to determine leaf disposition, area, width, and length, regardless of light intensity received, for fall, winter, and spring months. In addition, climatic data were collected.

Results for the winter growth period were significant. The winter results showed that I/IO values for leaves in NS and EW rows differed markedly during the slow-growing winter season. Furthermore, on cold, windy days, it was found that leaves in NS rows were prostrate and leaves in EW rows were erect, apparently because the plants in the EW rows were protected in the winter from the prevailing northerly winds by ridges made at planting. The leaf measurements showed that leaves in EW rows were long and narrow and leaves in NS rows were short and wide. Also, plants in NS and EW rows had most leaves pointing southerly and easterly, respectively, for all seasons; fewest leaves pointed northeasterly in both NS and EW rows. There were more living leaves in NS rows than in EW rows. The leaf measurements and I/IO calculations showed that, during winter, the leaves in EW rows, which were generally erect and not prostrate (horizontal), were oriented in many directions and had the full range of I/IO values (range: 0 to 1.00), while leaves in NS rows, which were often not erect, but prostrate, despite wind, had a range of values of I/IO from 0.18 to 0.76, independent of leaf direction.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell. • Leaf angle • Solar azimuth • Solar altitude • Row direction • Leaf length • Leaf width • Leaf area


1 Contribution No. 82-203-J, Dep. of Agronomy, Evapotranspiration Laboratory, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan, KS 66506.

2 Associate professor, Kansas State Univ.

Received for publication December 23, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Agronomy.