Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1980
Published in Agron J 72:654-656 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winter, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Winter, S. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Winter, S. R.

Planting Sugarbeets to Stand when Establishment is Erratic1

S. R. Winter2

Planting sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.) to stand is desirable if yields can be maintained. Low seeding rates eliminate the need to thin; however, yield and quality suffer if harvest stand is low. Sugarbeet stand establishment is erratic on the Southern High Plains. Therefore, planting to stand has been assumed to be unworkable. These studies were undertaken to determine the feasibility of planting to stand where establishment is erratic.

Sugarbeets were planted to stand at a wide range of seeding rates and compared to an overplanted, handthinned check. Rows were 76-cm apart on Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Torrertic Paleustolls order Mollisol). Yield and harvest loss were determined on the center two rows of four-row field plots with commercial harvesting equipment.

Establishment of planted seed ranged from 31 to 63% and averaged 46%. Harvested mot yield and percent sucrose were reduced if harvest stand fell below four . More than 10.0 plants/m reduced root yield thin stands, less in thick stands, and least in near optimum stands (five to seven plants/m). Optimum seeding rate depended on establishment conditions; however, results were consistently good when planting to stand at 16.7 seeds/m of row. At this seediing rate, harvested sucrose yield ranged from 94.5 to 100.2% and averaged 97.8% of the hand-thinned check. Thus, sugarbeets were successfully planted to stand even with low and erratic establishment. Planting sugarbeets to stand should be successful in other areas. The key to success is using a seeding rate high enough to guard against the lowest commonly expected establishment.

Key Words: Stand density • Stand establishment • Thinning • Seeding rate • Harvest losses • Hand-thinning • Harvest stand • Beta vulgaris L.


1 Contribution from the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ. as Technical Article 14524 in cooperation with USDASEA.

2 Associate professor, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ. System, USDA Southwestern Great Plains Res. Ctr., Bushland. TX 79012.

Received for publication September 25, 1978.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy.