Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1980
Published in Agron J 72:469-472 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Freney, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Freney, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Freney, J. R.

Assessing the Sulfur Status of Field-Grown Wheat by Plant Analysis1

K. Spencer and J. R. Freney2

Diagnostic methods developed under laboratory or greenhouse conditions require field confirmation. This paper reports the relative field performance of four indexes for the diagnosis of S deficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) which were previously assessed in the greenhouse. Sulfate S (as percent total S), sulfate S concentration (as ppm dry matter), total S concentration (as ppm dry matter), and total N: total S ratio in the aboveground parts of a soft white wheat cultivar, ‘Olympic’, were compared as diagnostic indexes in a factorial experiment with five rates of gypsum (0 to 50 kg S/ha) and three rates of ammonium nitrate (0 to 100 kg N/ha). A strong relationship was found between final grain yield and each index at the following stages of growth; fourth leaf (61 days from sowing), fully-tillered (92 days), and jointing (134 days). However, as the critical value for sulfate S (as percent total S) was least affected by the age of the plant or N supply, it is considered to be the most convenient index. The overall relationship between yield and sulfate S (as percent total S) was strong (r = 0.88) and the critical value at 90% of maximum yield was 13%. This compares with r values of 0.87, 0.96, and 0.91 and critical values of 14, 12, and 11% for the plant tissue at the individual growth stages examined. Where the adequacy of the S supply to a wheat crop is in question, the proportion of total S as sulfate S in the plants is indicated as a useful guide to the need for S fertilizer in securing optimal grain yield.

Key Words: Sulfur deficiency • S fertilizer response • Triticum aestivum L.


1 Contribution from CSIRO, Australia.

2 Senior principal research scientists, CSIRO Div. of Plant Ind., P. O. Box 1600, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, Australia.

Received for publication July 30, 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy.