Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1980
Published in Agron J 72:378-387 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hovin, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hovin, A. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hovin, A. W.

Harvest Schedule, Persistence, Yield, and Quality Interactions among Four Perennial Grasses1

G. C. Marten and A. W. Hovin2

Comprehensive analysis of the interactions between harvest schedule and persistence, hay yield, and forage quality is lacking for cool-season perennial grasses. Our objective was to determine whether harvest schedules typical of those producing a range from poor to excellent hay quality (two, three, or four times of cutting/year) under weed-free conditions would differentially influence these properties for orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.).

Three harvest schedules were used during the fist 3 production years of this field experiment on Typic Hapludoll soil. In the 4th and 5th years, all plots were harvested thee times to determine whether any adverse responses by the grasses to either more or less frequent harvest could be overcome.

Smooth bromegrass persisted poorest at the four-cutting schedule, tall fescue and orchardgrass persisted poorest at the two-cutting schedule, and reed canarygrass persisted best at all cutting schedules. Smooth bromegrass cut four times recovered substantially after the switch to three-time harvest.

In vitro digestibility and crude protein concentration of reed canarygrass declined most rapidly, while those of orchardgrass or tall fescue declined least rapidly, due to maturation. The grasses did not differ greatly in rate of cell wall concentration increase. We obtained new evidence that crude protein concentration cannot be relied upon for assessment of generalized forage quality.

Reed canarygrass consistently yielded more dry matter than did smooth bromegrass, but otherwise frequent year-to-year yield variations existed among species and cutting schedules.

Our results show the necessity for imposition of several controlled harvest schedules over prolonged periods for accurate measurement of the potential of grasses intended for flexible forage management systems.

Key Words: Orchadgrass • Tall fescue • Reed canarygrass • Smooth bromegrass • In vitro digestible dry matter • Crude protein • Cell walls


1 Contribution of the USDA, SEA, AR, in cooperation with the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn.; Scientific Journal Series Paper No. 10,752.

2 Research agronomist, USDA-SEA-AR, and professor; and professor, Agronomy and Plant Genetics De., respectively, Univ. of Minnesota, 1509 Gortner Ave., St. Paul MN 55108.

Received for publication June 4, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. L. Kammes, G. B. H. Heemink, K. A. Albrecht, and D. K. Combs
Utilization of Kura Clover-Reed Canarygrass Silage Versus Alfalfa Silage by Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3138 - 3144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. C. Burns, D. S. Fisher, and G. E. Rottinghaus
Grazing Influences on Mass, Nutritive Value, and Persistence of Stockpiled Jesup Tall Fescue without and with Novel and Wild-Type Fungal Endophytes
Crop Sci., July 25, 2006; 46(5): 1898 - 1912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. L. Brenly-Bultemeier, D. J. Barker, R. M. Sulc, S. K. Harrison, and E. E. Regnier
Species Interactions with Quackgrass and Their Effects on Forage Production
Crop Sci., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 290 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Riesterer, M. D. Casler, D. J. Undersander, and D. K. Combs
Seasonal Yield Distribution of Cool-Season Grasses following Winter Defoliation
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 974 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy.