Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1980
Published in Agron J 72:153-156 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costa, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pendleton, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Costa, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pendleton, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Costa, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pendleton, J. W.

Response of Soybean Cultivars to Planting Patterns1

J. A. Costa, E. S. Oplinger and J. W. Pendleton2

Since soybean [Glycine max (L) Merr.] acreage continues to increase in the higher latitudes of the world the objective was to obtain agronomic information on the effect of inter and intra-row spacings on several of the most widely grown, early cultivars in America. Ten soybean cultivars differing in maturity (Group 0 through II) and growth characteriscia were grown in two row spacings (27-cm and 76-cm) and varying populations (132,000 to 741,000 plants/ha) for 3 years in field trials on Typic Arguidolls fine silty; mixed mesic soil near Madison, Wis.

Planting soybeans in 27-cm rows vs. more conventional 76-cm rows showed an average seed yield increase of 21% over all years, populations, and cultivars. All cultivars produced higher seed yields in narrow row spacings. The three early cultivars (Group O Maturity) generally exhibited a greater yield response (+27%) to narrow row spacings than did cultivars in Maturity Groups I and II (+19%). However, the later maturing cultivars generally produced the highest yields over all row spacings, plant populations and years. Varying the intra-row plant spacing did not significantly affect seed yields. Increasing plant populations decreased the number of branches per plant and increased lodging, seed weight, and LAI. While the LAI increased as plant population increased in both the narrow and wide rows, no correlation existed with grain yield. Increasing the plant population in each row spacing increased the height of the lower pod by a range of 40 to 50%.

The availability of new varieties with improved lodging resistance and herbicides with greater selectivity may lead to an accelerated acceptance of narrow row soybean production systems to capitalize on the increased yield potential in the northern growing regions.

Key Words: Glycine may (L.) Merr. • Soybean genotypes • Row spacing • Plant population


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Stn., Madison, WI 53706. Part of the research submitted by the senior author as partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree.

2 Associate professor agronomy, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porte Alegre, Brazil: professors, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

Received for publication May 16, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. O. Hanna, S. P. Conley, G. E. Shaner, and J. B. Santini
Fungicide Application Timing and Row Spacing Effect on Soybean Canopy Penetration and Grain Yield
Agron. J., September 8, 2008; 100(5): 1488 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E. R. Cober, M. J. Morrison, B. Ma, and G. Butler
Genetic Improvement Rates of Short-Season Soybean Increase with Plant Population
Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1029 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. J. Kratochvil, J. T. Pearce, and M. R. Harrison Jr.
Row-Spacing and Seeding Rate Effects on Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean for Mid-Atlantic Production Systems
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1029 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. E. Lanier, D. L. Jordan, J. F. Spears, R. Wells, P. D. Johnson, J. S. Barnes, C. A. Hurt, R. L. Brandenburg, and J. E. Bailey
Peanut Response to Planting Pattern, Row Spacing, and Irrigation
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1066 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. G. Bertram and P. Pedersen
Adjusting Management Practices Using Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Cultivars
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 462 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. Pedersen and J. G. Lauer
Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System
Agron. J., July 1, 2003; 95(4): 965 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. M. Lambert and J. Lowenberg-DeBoer
Economic Analysis of Row Spacing for Corn and Soybean
Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 564 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. Rigsby and J. E. Board
Identification of Soybean Cultivars That Yield Well at Low Plant Populations
Crop Sci., January 1, 2003; 43(1): 234 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. H. Jost and J. T. Cothren
Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra-Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1150 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. P. Mathew, S. J. Herbert, S. Zhang, A. A.F. Rautenkranz, and G. V. Litchfield
Differential Response of Soybean Yield Components to the Timing of Light Enrichment
Agron. J., November 1, 2000; 92(6): 1156 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. Board
Light Interception Efficiency and Light Quality Affect Yield Compensation of Soybean at Low Plant Populations
Crop Sci., September 1, 2000; 40(5): 1285 - 1294.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy.