Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1980
Published in Agron J 72:118-123 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winter, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Winter, S. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Winter, S. R.

Suitability of Sugarbeets for Limited Irrigation in a Semi-arid Climate1

S. R. Winter2

Traditional heavy irrigation of sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L.) on the Southern High Plains is being questioned because of declining pumping rates and increasing cost of energy for pumping irrigation water. The objective of this work was to determine the suitability of sugarbeets for limited irrigation in a semi-arid climate. Sugarbeets were flood-irrigated in level basins enclosed by dikes with water accurately measured onto each plot. Soil was Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Torrertic Paleustolls order Mollisols), a very slowly permeable soil representative of the majority of sugarbeet acreage in this region. Irrigation schedules and amounts were varied to produce a wide range of water stress severity, duration, and timing. Weather was typical of this region; erratic precipitation totaled about one-fourth of pan evaporation, and hot, dry, windy conditions frequently prevailed. Sugarbeets made efficient use of limited rainfall and soil profile water even when subjected to periods of water stress as long as 5 months. Irrigation water was most efficiently used when water application was adequate to maintain a nearly full canopy with no periods of major water stress or excessive water. One irrigation applied prior to onset of major water stress in July promoted high water use efficiency. Sugarbeet response to limited irrigation compares favorably to that of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), the major summer crop presently grown on the Southern High Plains with limited irrigation. No unusual production problems have occurred with limited irrigation of sugarbeets. This work indicates that sugarbeets can be efficiently grown under a wide range of irrigation level. Sugarbeets readily adapt to limited irrigation because they utilize deep-stored soil water and quickly recover growth following major water stress.

Key Words: Plant water stress • Water use efficiency • Adaptation to water stress • Irrigation scheduling • Tensiometer • Crop rotations • Sucrose • Ground cover • Rooting depth • Beta vulgaris L.


1 Contribution from the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., 6500 Amarillo Blvd. West, Amarillo, TX 79106 as Tech. Article No. 14788 in cooperation with USDA, SEA.

2 Associate professor, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Amarillo.

Received for publication March 2, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
N. Th. Mazahrih, N. Katbeh-Bader, S. R. Evett, J. E. Ayars, and T. J. Trout
Field Calibration Accuracy and Utility of Four Down-Hole Water Content Sensors
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2008; 7(3): 992 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy.