Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1979
Published in Agron J 71:929-931 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abernathy, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abernathy, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, L. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Abernathy, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, L. L.

Cotton Cultivar Response to Propazine and Atrazine1

J. R. Abernathy, J. W. Keeling and L. L. Ray2

Forty-eight cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars were evaluated in field studies over a 2-year period to determine tolerance to phytotoxic soil residue levels of propazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis (isopropylamine)-s-triazine] and atrazine [Z-chloro-4-(ethylamiamino)-6-isopropylami)-s-triazine] present after use in rotational grain crops. After planting, preemergence, broadcast applications of atrazine and propazine at 0.56 kg/ha were applied to an Amarillo sandy clay loam soil (a member of the fineloamy, mixed thermic family of Aridic Paleustalfs). Cotton cultivars injury ratings were obtained 6 to 8 weeks after planting, In anotha study, propazine rates of 0.56 and 1.12 kg/ha were applied preemergence to test yield differences between tolerant and susceptible cotton cultivars.

Injury ranged from 8 to SO%, and 3 to 53% among varieties subjected to atrazine and propazine, respectively. In the propazine yield test, where a tolerant cotton cultivar (‘Paymaster 303’), was compared to a sensitive cotton cultivar (‘Paymaster lllA’), the tolerant cultivar produced 210 %/ha more than the sensitive cultivar. In the absence of the herbicide, there were no differences in the yield of the two cultivars. This research indicates that choice of cultivar can significantly limit injury to cotton and the likelihood of reduced yields.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum • Cotton • Triazine • Cultivar • Tolerance • Residue • Propazine • Atrazine


1 Journal Article TA 14348 of the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Associate professor, research associate, and professor, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401.

Received for publication February 1, 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Agronomy.