Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1979
Published in Agron J 71:91-94 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jolliff, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hertel, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jolliff, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hertel, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jolliff, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hertel, J. M.

Seasonal Forage Nutritive Value Variation of Coastal and Coastcross-1 Bermudagrass1

Gary D. Jolliff, A. Garza and J. M. Hertel2

Chronological age is a common basis of reference used in bermudagrass research treatments and forage production management recommendations. Plant growth and development changes due to the environment could cause a confounding of research results when assuming that forage of a given chronological age has a similar nutritive value regardless of the season or year. This field study on victoria clay soil (a Typic Pellusterts) was conducted to measure the mouth-to-mouth variation in quality of Coastal and Coastcross-1 varieties of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon, (L.) Pers.) harvested at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 week growth intervals through the 1975 growing season, Samples were taken from March through December. Acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), crude protein (CP), and in vitro dry matter digestibilit (IVDMD) were measured. Statistical comparisons or quality were made only within age intervals. Fifty percent of 312 month-to-month comparisons were significantly different. Coastcross-1 bermudagrass was more variable than Coastal bermudagrass, because of greater declines as well as greater increases in quality due to environmental changes. The 8-week-old forage had the greatest variation in quality in both varieties. The most measurable variability was in crude protein content. Month-to-month variability of CP declined with advancing maturity in Coastal and increased in Coastcross-1. Variation as measured by ADF and IVDMD was second and third to CP, respectively, and the grassa responded similarly. Overall variability measured by NDF was the lowest of the four methods used. Actual percentage changes in ADF, NDF, CP, and IVDMD of 8-week-old forage within a 30day period was as high as 9.9, 3.0, 4.6, and 12.7 percentage units, respectively, for Coastcross-1. The impact of environmental conditions on forage quality was significant and was dependent up on the age of the grass, the specific quality component in question, and the grass variety. Therefore, care should be exercised in extrapolating research data from one season of the year to another even at the same geographical location.

Key Words: Acid detergent fiber (ADF) • Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) • Crude protein (CP) • in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) • Forage management • Forage quality • Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.


1 Contribution from the College of Agric., Texas A & I Univ., ille, TX 78363. Research supported by the 1972 Texas Legislative House Bill 75 appropriation.

2 State professor of crop science, Oregon State Univ.; former graduate research assistant; and former director Texas A & Forage Testing Lab., now research associate, Dep. of . Purdue Univ., respectirely.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Agronomy.