Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 1977
Published in Agron J 69:332-335 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. J.

The Brown-Rosenberg Resistance Model of Crop Evapotranspiration Modified Tests in an Irrigated Sorghum Field1

Shashi B. Verma and Norman J. Rosenberg2

The Brown-Rosenberg (1973) resistance model was modified to simplify its calculation and increase its usefulness for estimating evapotranspiration. The model requires inputs of net radiation, air temperature, and vapor pressure and canopy and boundary layer resistance. The first three of these parameters are measured. In the modified version canopy resistance is estimated from a functional dependence on irradiance. The boundary layer resistance is estimated from a functional dependence on windspeed. The modification was tested in an irrigated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench, cv ‘Rs 633’) field at Mead, Neb.

The model predictions generally agreed to within 10%, on both an hourly and daily basis, with direct lysimetric and Bowen ratio-energy balance measurements of evapotranspiration from the sorghum.

The Brown-Rosenberg model in its original and modified forms is useful when neither direct nor remotely sensed crop canopy temperature data are available and when there is need to evaluate the impact on evapotranspiration of several of the aforementioned environmental and crop parameters.

Key Words: Net radiation • Air temperature • Air vapor pressure • Canopy resistance • Stomatal resistance • Potential evapotranspiration


1 Published as Paper No. 5132, Journal Series, Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. The work reported was conducted under Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Project No. 20-31 and Regional Research Project 11-33.

2 Assistant professor and professor, Agricultural Meteorology Section, Dep. of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583.

Received for publication June 10, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy.