Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 July 1971
Published in Agron J 63:569-572 (1971)
© 1971 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downey, L. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Downey, L. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Downey, L. A

Effect of Gypsum and Drought Stress on Maize (Zea mays L.). I. Growth, Light Absorption and Yield1

Lloyd A Downey2

An experiment was designed to study the effect of gypsum and drought stress on growth, water status and yield with maize (Zea mays L.). Water status was assessed under field conditions by measurements of relative turgidity (RT) at noon. No stress was defined as RT greater than 90% — drought stress as RT less than 90%. A nostress crop was compared with a crop drought stressed for a period of 20 days during male meiosis and with a crop drought stressed during grain filling (after pollination to maturity). These treatments were set out in a randomised block design with a further comparison between the untreated sodic clay soil (control) and the same soil treated with gypsum.

Gypsum and no-stress conditions stimulated tiller production so that the final effective plant densities were above optimum. The no-stress treatments produced large amounts of dry matter but this was channelled into sterile tillers rather than into grain. Drought stress during male meiosis stunted growth, stunted tassel development, reduced chlorophyll content and light absorption (during the period of stress) but, overall, was not very detrimental to grain yield. Drought stress during grain filling reduced grain yield by 50%; grain weight was reduced and a very high proportion of photosynthate went into sterile tillers.

Key Words: Water stress • Meiosis • Ameliorant • Relative turgidity • Relative water content • Irrigation • Corn


1 C.S.I.R.O. Division of Irrigation Research, Griffith N.S.W. 2680 Australia.

2 Present address: Agricultural Research. Station Leeton N.S.W. 2705, Australia.

Received for publication October 17, 1970.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Agronomy.