Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1968
Published in Agron J 60:630-632 (1968)
© 1968 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlton, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eslick, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carlton, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eslick, R. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carlton, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eslick, R. F.

Growth and Forage Quality Comparisons of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop.) and Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)1

A. E. Carlton, C. S. Cooper, R. H. Delaney, A. L. Dubbs and R. F. Eslick2

We calculated seasonal accumulation of dry matter and crude protein in sainfoin and alfalfa and feed qualily at three stages of maturity when species were grown on irrigated and dryland. Maximum accumulation of dry matter and crude protein occurred between 2 and 45% bloom for alfalfa and at 100% bloom for sainfoin on irrigated land. Dry matter and crude protein yield trends for both crops were similar on irrigated land and dryland. The maximum dry matter and crude protein contents for both sainfoin and alfalfa occurred at about the same calendar date on dryland but at different dates under irrigation. Decreases in the percentage of crude protein were similar in both species with time. At all sampling dates crude protein percentage of alfalfa was greater than for sainfoin.

At similar stages of maturity alfalfa was consistently higher than sainfoin in crude protein, ash, calcium, and crude fiber; and with few exceptions it was lower in nitrogen-free extract, total digestible nutrients, and P. At the point of maximum yield for each species (10% bloom for alfalfa, 100% bloom for sainfoin) crude fiber and total digestible nutrient content was similar, but alfalfa contained 6% more protein and 9 to 10% less nitrogen-free extract than sainfoin. We concluded that sainfoin hay would supply adequate protein to meet the needs of beef animals, and that it would supply total available energy equal or superior to that of alfalfa.

Key Words: Dry matter accumulation


1 Cooperative investigations of Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. and Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bozeman, Montana. Published with approval of Director, Montana Agr. Exp. Sta. as Journal Series No. 875.

2 Assistant Professor, Montana Agr. Exp. Sta.; Agronomist, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA; Kesearch Assistant; Supt., Central Montana Branch Exp. Sta.; and Professor, Montana Agr. Exp. Sta.

Received for publication April 13, 1968.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Peel, K. H. Asay, D. A. Johnson, and B. L. Waldron
Forage Production of Sainfoin across an Irrigation Gradient
Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Agronomy.