Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1968
Published in Agron J 60:84-86 (1968)
© 1968 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Bavel, C. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrler, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Bavel, C. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrler, W. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Van Bavel, C. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrler, W. L.

Water Loss from a Sorghum Field and Stomatal Control1

C. H. M. Van Bavel and W. L. Ehrler2

Measurements of temperature and diffusion resistance of leaves and of micrometeorological factors in a wellwatered sorghum field during June in central Arizona show that the stomata regulate transpiration only during the periods of darkness and low light. This was concluded from a comparison of the values for the canopy resistance as derived from direct measurement on leaves and as calculated from the environmental data.

This finding predicts that, during the main part of the daylight period, neither an increase in number or aperture of stomata nor a wetting of the entire foliage would increase the evaporative flux. The action of the sorghum plant is then like that of a wick.

We also found that, in a hot and dry environment, the sorghum foliage will constantly be several degrees cooler than the ambient air, even in the middle of the day when radiant energy input is large. Finally, the energy equivalent of the evaporative flux exceeded the net radiant flux significantly at all times, and by 80% over a 24-hour period.

All three findings are at variance with common generalizations concerning the energetics and mechanics of crop transpiration. However, we recognize that our findings cannot be generalized to include other crop plants without specific studies.

Key Words: transpiration • canopy resistance


1 Contribution from the Soil and Water Conservation Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. Supported in part by the Atmospheric Sciences Laboratory Research Division, USA, ECOM, Fort Huachuca, Ariz.

2 Chief Physicist and Plant Physiologist, U. S. Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix, Ariz. Current affiliation of the first author is: Institute of Life Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

Received for publication June 17, 1967.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
V. Bandaru, B. A. Stewart, R. L. Baumhardt, S. Ambati, C. A. Robinson, and A. Schlegel
Growing Dryland Grain Sorghum in Clumps to Reduce Vegetative Growth and Increase Yield
Agron. J., June 27, 2006; 98(4): 1109 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. K. SMITH
Temperatures of Desert Plants: Another Perspective on the Adaptability of Leaf Size
Science, August 18, 1978; 201(4356): 614 - 616.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Agronomy.