Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 1968
Published in Agron J 60:7-11 (1968)
© 1968 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holt, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holt, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holt, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, J. A.

Yield and Stand Survival of ‘Coastal’ Bermudagrass as Influenced by Management Practices1

Ethan C. Holt and J. A. Lancaster2

A study was conducted over a 5-year period to evaluate the effects of clipping practices and fertility levels on forage yields and stand survival of ‘Coastal’ bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers. Yields were greater with a short stubble height (5 cm), infrequent harvest (35 to 40 cm of growth) and nitrogen fertilization. Yield and ground cover density increased with nitrogen fertilization and also in each succeeding year of the experiment. Root weight was not influenced by nitrogen fertilization and declined in each succeeding year of the study. Ground cover increase and root weight decline were slightly greater with close, frequent defoliation. Neither the density nor the root weight changes were related to yields. Differences in carbohydrate percent of both stems and rhizomes were detectable immediately following clipping, but no permanent or major sustained treatment effects were found. Height of cutting appears to be less important in Coastal bermudagrass production than either frequency of defoliation or level of fertilization, but Coastal bermudagrass will tolerate a wide range in both height and frequency of defoliation.

Key Words: sustained yield • vigor • root weight • ground cover • clipping effects • fertilization


1 Contribution from Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

2 Professor, Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M Univ., College Station; and Associate Agronomist, East Texas Research and Extension Center, Overton, Texas.

Received for publication April 20, 1967.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. J. Franzluebbers, S. R. Wilkinson, and J. A. Stuedemann
Bermudagrass Management in the Southern Piedmont USA: X. Coastal Productivity and Persistence in Response to Fertilization and Defoliation Regimes
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1400 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Agronomy.