Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1966
Published in Agron J 58:521-522 (1966)
© 1966 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hart, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.

Prostrate vs. Common Dallisgrass Under Different Clipping Frequencies and Fertility Levels1

Richard H. Hart and Glenn W. Burton2

Prostrate and common daffisgrasses were fertilized with 0, 50, 100, 200, or 400 pounds of nitrogen per acre, and harvested every 2 or 4 weeks. Prostrate consistently produced higher forage yields than common, with the difference between varieties more marked at higher nitrogen levels and when cut every 4 weeks. Yields of both grasses were higher when cut every 4 weeks than when cut every 2 weeks, and increased with increasing rates of nitrogen, up to 400 pounds per acre. Higher yields of prostrate were due to faster growth in June, July, and August, with little difference between varieties before or after this period. Crude protein content of both grasses increased with increasing nitrogen and more frequent cutting, with no significant difference between grasses. Forty months after establishment, there were fewer weeds in prostrate dallis than in common. In view of these results, prostrate dallisgrass is recommended for light, poorly drained soils in the South when seed becomes commercially available.


1 Cooperative investigations at Tifton, Ga., of the Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, and the University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Station, Coastal Plain Experiment Station. Published with the approval of the Director as Journal Series Paper No. 231.

2 Former Research Agronomist and Principal Geneticist, respectively, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, and the University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Station, Tifton, Ga. Senior author now at Plant Industry Station, Beltsville, Maryland.

Received for publication May 11, 1966.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. C. Venuto, B. L. Burson, M. A. Hussey, D. D. Redfearn, W. E. Wyatt, and L. P. Brown
Forage Yield, Nutritive Value, and Grazing Tolerance of Dallisgrass Biotypes
Crop Sci., January 1, 2003; 43(1): 295 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Agronomy.