Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1966
Published in Agron J 58:465-468 (1966)
© 1966 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mantell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanhill, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mantell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanhill, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mantell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stanhill, G.

Comparison of Methods for Evaluating the Response of Lawngrass to Irrigation and Nitrogen Treatments1

A. Mantell and G. Stanhill2

The growth of a Kikuyu grass lawn on sandy loam soil was studied in a factorial experiment which included five irrigation frequencies (7, 14, 21, 25, and 30 days) and three levels of nitrogen fertilization (0, 2.1, and 4.2 kg N/1000 m2/month). Four methods were used in evaluating lawn quality: visual rating, leaf chlorophyll content, light reflection, and plant density. All methods were highly sensitive in detecting changes in the condition of the grass. An increase in either irrigation frequency or nitrogen application improved lawn quality (higher visual rating, lower light reflection, greater chlorophyll content, and higher plant density). The light meter readings indicated regular cycles of color change during the irrigation season. Correlations between all the methods were highly significant. It is suggested that by selecting a desirable lawn rating and determining the equivalent level of reflected light, management practice could be regulated with the use of a photocell. The method is characterized by its simplicity, rapidity, and objectivity


1 Contribution from The National and University Institute of agriculture, Rehovot, Israel. 1965 Series, No. 947-E.

2 Research Soil Scientist and Agricultural Meteorologist, The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Rehovot, Israel.

Received for publication November 12, 1965.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Agronomy.