Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 1966
Published in Agron J 58:249-252 (1966)
© 1966 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Volk, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Volk, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Volk, G. M.

Efficiency of Fertilizer Urea as Affected by Method of Application, Soil Moisture, and Lime1

Gaylord M. Volk2

The persistence of surface-applied urea and comparative crop responses to solution and solid N sources including urea were studied on sandy soils of pH 5.4 to 6.0 and 1.7 to 2.5% organic matter. Over 80% of prilled urea applied to a soil with an air-dry surface under field conditions did not hydrolyze within 14 days, and from 42 to 72% persisted where a soil surface was only temporarily moist from recent tillage or irrigation, even though heavy dews formed nightly. With an exposed surface, continuously moist from a high water table, urea completely hydrolyzed within 7 days, with 65% of the applied N not accounted for as NH4+ and assumed largely lost as NH3 gas.

Response of pasture grasses usually showed urea to be inferior to other N sources, with ammonium nitrate being the most consistently superior. Efficiency of urea and solutions appeared to be increased by rain immediately after application. Surface liming depressed responses to urea and materials containing ammonium-N. Response of sweet corn to side dressings of urea was slightly inferior to responses to solid or solution-N materials containing nitrate-N, apparently as a result of faster penetration of NO3- as compared to NH4+ when moisture permitted. Covering urea or applying it on a temporarily moist vs dry surface had no differentiating effect.

Persistence of urea on air-dry or temporarily moist soil surface until incorporated by tillage or rainfall vs rapid loss of NH3 if a moist surface persists is a logical explanation of erratic responses to surface-applied urea.


1 Contribution from the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Gainesville, Florida. Journal Series No. 2297.

2 Soils Chemist.

Received for publication October 1, 1965.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Agronomy.