|
|
||||||||
Synopsis: There was less water use from a 21-inch row spacing than for 32- or 42-inch spacings. A higher rate of water use occurred with higher stands, but the increase in water use was much smaller than the stand increase. The efficiency of water use was highest on the 21-inch row spacing and the lowest on the 42-inch spacing.
2 Formerly Research Associate in Agronomy (Agricultural Climatology) (now Research Meteorologist, Foreign Area Section, Office of Climatology, U. S. Weather Bureau, Suitland, Md.) and Professor of Agricultural Climatology, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Received for publication June 17, 1963.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. Sharratt and D. A. McWilliams Microclimatic and Rooting Characteristics of Narrow-Row versus Conventional-Row Corn Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1129 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Barbieri, H. R.S. Rozas, F. H. Andrade, and H. E. Echeverria Row Spacing Effects at Different Levels of Nitrogen Availability in Maize Agron. J., March 1, 2000; 92(2): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||