|
|
||||||||
Synopsis: Most of the yield variations resulted from differences in second-ear yield when a significant number of second ears were produced. First-ear yield was relatively unaffected by environment unless the crop was so poor that few second ears developed. Variations in second-ear yields resulted primarily from differences in number rather than size. The plants tended to develop a fullsized first ear, and any additional yield came largely from second ears.
2 Research Agronomist, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA.
Received for publication August 7, 1959.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. T. Ritchie and G. Alagarswamy Model Concepts to Express Genetic Differences in Maize Yield Components Agron. J., January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jampatong, L.L. Darrah, G.F. Krause, and B.D. Barry Effect of One- and Two-Eared Selection on Stalk Strength and Other Characters in Maize Crop Sci., May 1, 2000; 40(3): 605 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||