HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kamprath, E. J. Articles by Fitts, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kamprath, E. J. Articles by Fitts, J. W. Agricola Articles by Kamprath, E. J. Articles by Fitts, J. W.

Sulfur Removed from Soils by Field Crops¹

Sypnosis: More organic sulfur than inorganic sulfate was contained in the surface horizons of a Durham and Marlboro soil. In the lower horizons there was an accumulation of sulfate in both soils. On the Durham soil sulfur deficiencies were exhibited. by cotton and tobacco early in the growing season. Only cotton gave a response to additions of gypsum. Cotton and soybeans removed considerably more sulfur than tobacco or corn. Availability of soil sulfur was evaluated by use of yield of sulfur Curves

² Assistant Professor of Soils, North Carolina State College; formerly Professor of Agronomy, North Carolina State College and now Mid-west Manager of the American Potash Institute, Inc.; and Head of the Department of Soils, North Carolina State College. respectively.

Received for publication December 10, 1956.