|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a Dow AgroSciences, 2310 County Road/1050 North, Homer, IL 61849
b Agronomy Dep., Purdue Univ., 915 W State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054
c Dep. of Plant Agriculture, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
* Corresponding author (tvyn{at}purdue.edu).
Mounting concerns over the cost and environmental impact of N fertilizer combined with progressively higher plant densities in maize (Zea mays L.) production systems make progress in maize N use efficiency (NUE) and N stress tolerance essential. The primary objectives of this 3-yr field study were to (i) evaluate the N responsiveness, NUE, and N stress tolerance of multiple modern maize genotypes using suboptimal, optimal, and supraoptimal plant densities (54,000, 79,000, and 104,000 plants ha–1, respectively) with three levels of side-dress N (0, 165, and 330 kg N ha–1), (ii) identify key morphophysiological responses to the simultaneous stresses of intense crowding and low N availability, and (iii) consider our results with extensive reference to literature on maize morphophysiological responses to plant crowding and N availability. At optimal and supraoptimal plant densities, maize receiving 165 kg ha–1 of side-dress N displayed strong N responsiveness, high NUE, pronounced crowding tolerance, and plant density independence. However, crowding tolerance was contingent on N application. Relative to less crowded, N-fertilized environments, the 104,000 plants ha–1, 0 kg N ha–1 treatment combination exhibited (i) reduced pre- and postanthesis plant height (PHT), stem diameter (SD), and total biomass; (ii) greater preflowering leaf senescence and lower R1 leaf areas at individual-leaf, per-plant, and canopy levels; (iii) enhanced floral protandry; (iv) lower pre- and postanthesis leaf-chlorophyll content; (v) lower per-plant kernel number (KNP), individual kernel weight (KW), grain yield per plant (GYP), andharvest index per plant (HIP); and (vi) enhanced per-plant grain yield variability (GYCV). Genetic efforts to improve high plant density tolerance should, therefore, simultaneously focus on enhancing NUE and N stress tolerance.
Abbreviations: ACRE, Purdue University Agronomy Center for Research and Education ASIP, per-plant anthesis–silking interval b, a coefficient that describes the breadth/kurtosis of the distribution of green leaf area GDD, growing degree days GYA, per-unit-area grain yield GYCV, per-plant grain yield variability GYP, per-plant grain yield GYSA, per-plant sampling area grain yield HI, harvest index HIP, per-plant harvest index KNP, per-plant kernel number KW, individual kernel weight LAD, per-plant green leaf area distribution LAn, fully expanded individual leaf area LAP, per-plant green leaf area LÁT, per-plant green leaf area of tagged, nondestructively sampled plants LAIG, green leaf area index NLT, total number of green leaves per plant NR, nitrogen application rate NUE, nitrogen use efficiency PDA, personal digital assistant PHT, plant height PPAC, Pinney-Purdue Agricultural Center SD, stem diameter SPAD, single-photon avalanche diode TBP, aboveground per-plant total biomass VBP, aboveground per-plant vegetative biomass xe, earleaf position xH, position of the highest green leaf xL, position of the lowest green leaf xo, position of the largest leaf
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Received for publication February 27, 2009.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |