Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 101:1297-1303 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0052
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ephrath, J. E.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ephrath, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ephrath, J. E.

COTTON

Sand Abrasion Injury and Biomass Partitioning in Cotton Seedlings

Jeffrey T. Bakera,*, Bobbie McMichaelb, John J. Burkeb, Dennis C. Gitzb, Robert J. Lascanob and Jhonathan E. Ephrathc

a USDA-ARS, Plant Stress and Water Conservation Laboratory, 302 West I-20, Big Spring, TX, 79720
b USDA-ARS, Plant Stress and Water Conservation Laboratory, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415
c Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990 Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel

* Corresponding author (Jeff.Baker{at}ars.usda.gov).

Wind blown soil particle abrasion negatively impacts millions of hectares of crops annually. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of wind and wind blown sand abrasion damage on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedling biomass partitioning to leaves, stems, and roots. Seedlings of three cotton cultivars were exposed to no wind (untreated controls) or sand abrasive flux densities of 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.35, and 0.5 g cm–1 width s–1 at a wind velocity of 13.4 m s–1 in a suction-type laboratory wind tunnel. Plants were destructively sampled at the time of the sand abrasion treatment and at approximately 2 and 4 wk after exposure. These three sampling dates provided two time intervals for assessing the amount of plant damage and regrowth using classical growth analysis. With increasing sand, abrasive flux density, whole plant, leaf, stem, and root biomass, as well as leaf area, were all reduced in both harvest intervals (P ≤ 0.05). Net assimilation rate (NAR) accounted for 96 and 75% of the variability in relative growth rate (RGR) in the first and second harvest intervals, respectively, with small but significant differences in leaf area ratio (LAR). Increasing plant damage caused by sand abrasion treatment resulted in preferential biomass partitioning to the damaged stems rather than roots during the first harvest interval, while a much more stable allometric allocation of biomass among plant organs was observed in the second harvest interval.

Abbreviations: {Sigma}Tu accumulated thermal units • NAR, net assimilation rate • LAR, leaf area ratio, RGR, relative growth rate • S/R, shoot-to-root biomass ratio • Tu, thermal units

1 Mention of this or other proprietary products is for the convenience of the readers only, and does not constitute endorsement or preferential treatment of these products by USDA-ARS.

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication February 4, 2009.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.