HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Pike, A. C. Articles by Karathanasis, A. D. PubMed Articles by Pike, A. C. Articles by Karathanasis, A. D. Agricola Articles by Pike, A. C. Articles by Karathanasis, A. D. Related Collections Soil Erosion Soil Models Site-Specific Analysis Soil Conservation Spatial Distribution Water Conservation

SITE-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS & MANAGEMENT

Erosion Index Derived from Terrain Attributes using Logistic Regression and Neural Networks

^a Photo Science, Lexington, KY 40503-3302
^b Dep. of Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
^c Dep. of Statistics, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington KY, 40506-0027
^d Biosystems and Agricultural Eng., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40546-0276

^* Corresponding author (mueller{at}uky.edu).

Maps identifying areas prone to channel erosion within agricultural fields could be useful for conservation planners. The objective of this study was to test an approach for creating such maps with logistic regression and neural networks. Survey grade elevation measurements were obtained from on a Central Kentucky farm. The elevation measurements were used to create 4 by 4-m digital elevation models (DEMs) from which terrain attributes were derived. Areas exhibiting evidence of erosion caused by overland water flow sufficient to justify the placement of grassed waterways were identified. The terrain attributes were used as predictor variables and models were fit using the field assessments of soil erosion. Leave-one-field-out validation analysis was conducted to assess the quality of predictions maps. For the models created with logistic regression, an average of 14% of the 4 by 4-m grid cells in noneroded areas were incorrectly classified as being eroded and 16% of cells in eroded areas were incorrectly classified as noneroded. For neural network analysis, these error rates were 15 and 19%, respectively. Most of these errors occurred because the analyses did not exactly define the shapes of the eroded features; however, both logistic regression and neural networks identified most waterway features in all fields. The proposed three-variable logistic regression model for erosion prediction should only be tested with datasets constructed using identical procedures for DEM creation and terrain analysis. This approach could improve the efficiency and accuracy of field site assessments for conservation planning.

Abbreviations: CREAMS, chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems • CRP, conservation reserve program • DEM, digital elevation model • EGEM, ephemeral gully erosion model • GeoWEPP, Geo-spatial interface for the Water Erosion Prediction Project • GIS, Geographic Information Systems • GPS, global positioning system • HEL, highly erodible land • LIDAR, light detecting and ranging • NRC, National Research Council • NRCS, Natural Resource Conservation Service • RTK, real-time kinematic • RUSLE, revised universal soil loss equation • USGS, United States Geological Survey • VRT, variable rate technologies

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication November 24, 2008.