Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 July 2009
Published in Agron J 101:933-939 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0209x
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lagae, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lagae, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lagae, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barbarick, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Municipal Wastes
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economic Value of Biosolids in a Semiarid Agroecosystem

Hubert J. Lagaea,*, Michael Langemeierb, Donald Lybeckerc and Kenneth Barbarickd

a USDA-ARS, Engineering and Wind Erosion Research Unit, Manhattan, KS
b Dep. of Agric. Economics, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS
c Dep. of Agric. Economics (emeritus)
d Dep. of Soil and Crop Sci., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523

* Corresponding author (Hubert.Lagae{at}ars.usda.gov).

Over half of the municipal biosolids generated in the United States are being applied to agricultural land. More information is needed on crop response to biosolids application and on the optimal level of the application from an economic prospective. With this in mind, data from two sites used in a long-term biosolids application study of an Eastern Colorado wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow rotation was analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The site on which biosolids had been applied since 1982 showed little significant (p < 0.10) response to biosolids added for the years studied. These plots also averaged one third higher in total N in the top 20 cm of soil. The other site, started in 1993, showed a very significant response to biosolids. For this site, the estimated maximum wheat yield was obtained at a biosolids application rate of 9.0 Mg ha–1. The economically optimal level of biosolids to apply depended on both the price of wheat and the cost of the biosolids. With wheat price of $0.20 kg–1 (USD) and a cost for biosolids (including application cost) of $4.00 Mg–1 the optimal level of biosolids applied was 7.3 Mg ha–1. Given an N fertilizer price of $1.10 per kg, a producer could afford to pay $7.47 Mg–1. Using biosolids as a soil amendment can have positive economic benefits; however, it needs to be monitored to avoid excessive nitrate accumulation or excessive levels of other nutrients or heavy metals.

Abbreviations: CBIO, the sum of biosolids applied to a plot in previous years • CN, carbon–nitrogen ratio • Y, estimated grain yield

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication November 26, 2008.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.