Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 June 2009
Published in Agron J 101:775-788 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0163x
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holman, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holman, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holman, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Wheat

WHEAT

Grazing Effects on Yield and Quality of Hard Red and Hard White Winter Wheat

Johnathon D. Holman*, Curtis R. Thompson, Ronald L. Hale and Alan J. Schlegel

Kansas State Univ. Southwest Research-Extension Center, 4500 East Mary St., Garden City, KS 67846. Contribution 09-121-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station

* Corresponding author (jholman{at}ksu.edu).

Six hard red (2137, Jagalene, Jagger, OK101, Stanton, and Thunderbolt) and six hard white (Burchett, Lakin, NuFrontier, NuHills, NuHorizon, and Trego) winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties were evaluated for grain yield and quality in southwestern Kansas in 2004 and 2005. Cattle commonly graze wheat in this region from late November to mid March in a dual-purpose system. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with split-plot treatment arrangement. Main plots were grazed or ungrazed, and subplot treatments were wheat varieties. Yield was not affected by color. Yield was reduced 23% when grazed beyond wheat jointing. NuHorizon yielded less when grazed. Test weight was 4 kg m–3 greater among red varieties in 2004 and 4 kg m–3 greater among white varieties in 2005. Grazing did not affect test weight. Color and grazing did not affect protein concentration. White varieties sprouted more than red varieties, but Burchett sprouted less than Stanton. Grazing did not affect sprouting. Kernel diameter was 0.1 mm greater among red than white varieties. Grazing reduced kernel diameter 0.1 mm in 2004. Kernel hardness was 4% greater among white than red varieties. Grazing increased kernel hardness 3% in 2005. Seed weight was 5% greater among red than white varieties. Grazing reduced seed weight 4%. Both red and white wheat can be used in a dual-purpose system with no substantial affects on yield or quality. Producers should select varieties on the basis of their system and environment because certain varieties responded better to grazing and environmental conditions than others.

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication November 3, 2008.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.