Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 May 2009
Published in Agron J 101:681-687 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0201
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Motavalli, P. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Management
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Maize Management
Right arrow Irrigation

CORN

Effect of Polymer Coated Urea, Irrigation, and Drainage on Nitrogen Utilization and Yield of Corn in a Claypan Soil

Kelly A. Nelsona,*, Sara M. Paniaguab and Peter P. Motavallib

a Div. of Plant Sci., Univ. of Missouri, Novelty, MO 63460
b Dep. of Soil, Environmental and Atmospheric Sci., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

* Corresponding author (nelsonke{at}missouri.edu).

Slow-release N fertilizers, such as polymer-coated urea (PCU), may increase crop N use and reduce NO3–N leaching. Research was conducted to evaluate NO3–N concentrations of soil water samples in noncoated urea (NCU) and PCU treated plots under different water management systems, and to determine differences in crop yields and N utilization among water and urea management systems. Water management treatments included: no irrigation or drainage (NIN), no irrigation and drainage with subsurface drain tiles 6.1 m apart (NID), subirrigation and drainage with tiles 6.1 m apart (SUB), and overhead irrigation with no drainage (OND), which were split into preplant-applied NCU or PCU at 0, 140, and 280 kg N ha–1. Water samples from suction lysimeters at a 45-cm depth in soil treated with PCU had 51 to 63% lower NO3–N concentration than NCU 59 d after application (DAA), while NCU had 85 to 92% lower N concentration than PCU 153 DAA. In 2005, N uptake was ranked OND > SUB ≥ NID = NIN for PCU and NCU treatments. Grain yield for water management systems was ranked NID = SUB ≥ OND ≥ NIN in 2004 and OND > SUB > NID ≥ NIN in 2005. No grain or silage yield differences between PCU and NCU treatments when applied at similar rates were observed in either year. This study showed no increase in N uptake by the crop with PCU compared with NCU; however, PCU reduced subsoil NO3–N concentration early in the season, which may reduce NO3–N leaching.

Abbreviations: DAA, days after nitrogen application • NCU, noncoated urea • NID, nonirrigated drained • NIN, nonirrigated and nondrained • OND, overhead irrigated nondrained • PCU, polymer-coated urea • SUB, subirrigated and drained

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication June 13, 2008.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.