HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Howell, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Howell, T. A. Agricola Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Howell, T. A. Related Collections Evapotranspiration Cotton Crop Models Irrigation

SYMPOSIUM PAPERS

Modeling Irrigation Management Strategies to Maximize Cotton Lint Yield and Water Use Efficiency

^a USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland TX 79012-0010
^b Kansas State Univ., 2004 Throckmorton, Plant Sci. Ctr., Manhattan, KS 66506

^* Corresponding author (r.louis.baumhardt{at}ars.usda.gov).

Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in the Southern High Plains compel producers to seek irrigation strategies to maximize yield and water use efficiency (WUE), which is the ratio of yield to evapotranspiration (ET). Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is suited to deficit irrigation using wells ranging from 0.29 to 0.93 L s^–1 ha^–1 capacity to supply limited, 2.5 mm d^–1, to complete, 8.1 mm d^–1 ET replacement. Our objectives were to (i) evaluate irrigation capacity and duration effects on lint yield, and (ii) compare application strategies that maximize yield and WUE. The simulation model GOSSYM was used with 1959 to 2000 weather records from Bushland, TX, to calculate yields of cotton grown on a Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) with 50 or 100% initial available soil water. We compared all combinations of irrigation duration (4, 6, 8, and 10 wk) and capacity (for ET replacement of 2.5, 3.75, and 5.0 mm d^–1 and dryland). Simulated lint yield decreased as irrigation decreased; however, yields for similar irrigation totals increased with increasing irrigation capacity. Simulated yields for cotton irrigated > 8 wk did not differ among irrigation capacities, but cotton irrigated at 5.0 mm d^–1 maintained yield with earlier irrigation termination at 6 wk. Based on mean yields, we determined that spreading water to deficit irrigate a field with 2.5 mm d^–1 yielded 5% less lint than concentrating that water to irrigate smaller fields at 3.75 or 5.0 mm d^–1 that were averaged with complementary (2:1 and 1:1) dryland areas.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • WUE, water use efficiency

¹ The mention of trade names of commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication August 5, 2008.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Evett and J. A. Tolk Introduction: Can Water Use Efficiency Be Modeled Well Enough to Impact Crop Management? Agron. J., April 3, 2009; 101(3): 423 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]