Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 4 March 2009
Published in Agron J 101:408-414 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0365
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deak, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deak, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Deak, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

FORAGES

Grazing Schedule Effect on Forage Production and Nutritive Value of Diverse Forage Mixtures

A. Deaka,*, M. H. Hallb and M. A. Sandersonc

a Monsanto Company, Corpus Christi, TX 78414
b The Pennsylvania State University, 116 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16802
c USDA-ARS, USDA-ARS Building 3702, University Park, PA 16802

* Corresponding author (atila.deak{at}monsanto.com).

The use of complex mixtures (mixtures of more than three species) may increase yield of pastures; however, we know little about how grazing management affects the productivity of mixtures. A grazing experiment was performed during 2005 and 2006 near State College, PA, to compare mixtures of grasses, legumes, and chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) for their botanical composition, nutritive value, and forage production under two grazing schedules: when the sward reached 25 cm in height (sward height schedule, SH) or when alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) reached the bud stage (morphology or MP schedule). The SH schedule produced 30% more dry matter (DM) than the MP schedule averaged for 2 yr. Forage yield of the five-species (6427 kg ha–1 in 2005 and 6624 kg ha–1 in 2006) and seven-species (6816 kg ha–1 in 2005 and 6772 kg ha–1 in 2006) mixtures was stable during the contrasting weather of 2005 and 2006. Grass monoculture with N and simple mixtures (two species, grass–legume) produced 989 kg ha–1 more DM than the complex mixtures in 2006 when weather conditions were favorable. The SH schedule produced forage of better nutritive value compared with the MP schedule at first harvest in both years [20 g kg–1 less acid detergent fiber (ADF) in 2006; 25 g kg–1 in 2005, 53 g kg–1 in 2006 more neutral detergent fiber (NDF); 21 g kg–1 in 2005, 30 g kg–1 in 2006 more crude protein (CP); and 33 g kg–1 in 2006, 53 g kg–1 more in vitro true dry matter digestibility (IVTDMD)]. Complex mixtures of forage species provide more consistent yields of DM than binary grass–legume mixtures or grass monocultures in variable environments.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid detergent fiber • CP, crude protein • DM, dry matter • IVTDMD, in vitro true dry matter digestibility • MP, morphology • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • SH, sward height schedule

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication November 9, 2007.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.