HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Berry, N. B. Articles by Brownie, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by O'Berry, N. B. Articles by Brownie, C. Agricola Articles by O'Berry, N. B. Articles by Brownie, C. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Other Crop Management Cotton Plant Growth Regulators Crop Systems Production Agriculture

COTTON

Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate

^a Isle of Wight County Extension Office, 17100 Monument Circle, Suite B, Isle of Wight, VA 23397
^b Dow AgroSciences, 1799 Percy Place, Collierville, TN 38017
^c Clemson University, Pee Dee Research and Education Center, 2200 Pocket Road, Florence, SC 29506
^d Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 6321 Holland Road, Suffolk, VA 23437
^e Crop and Soil Environmental Science Dep., Campus Box 0404, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
^f BASF Corporation, 5104 Indigo Moon Way, Raleigh, NC 27613
^g Professor Emerita, North Carolina State University, 3309 Horton Street, Raleigh, NC 27607

^* Corresponding author (noberry{at}vt.edu).

Plant growth regulators are routinely used in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production to reduce plant height and hasten maturity. The objective of this research was to determine the response of several cotton cultivars to mepiquat pentaborate (MPB) application in environments accumulating different levels of heat units. Four MPB application regimes were imposed on three cultivars in Virginia and South Carolina in 2005 and 2006. Total MPB season rates of 0.0, 54.9, 85.3, or 121.9 g ai ha^–1 applied at the five-leaf stage, pin-head square, match-head square, and early bloom were used. The cultivars were: Deltapine (DP) 444 BG/RR, an "early-maturing" cultivar; Fibermax (FM) 960 BR, a "medium-maturing" cultivar; and DP 555 BG/RR, a "late-maturing" cultivar. In South Carolina in 2006, FM 960 BR July plant height was reduced by 25% with MPB application compared to only 12 and 13% for DP 444 BG/RR and DP 555 BG/RR, respectively, although actual plant height reductions were not different among cultivars. Mepiquat pentaborate applications decreased plant height at harvest by 8 to 34%, height-to-node ratio by 10 to 32%, enhanced maturity as measured by nodes above white flower for all cultivars, and decreased lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5% compared to untreated cotton. Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.

Abbreviations: AMS, apical main-stem • DP, Deltapine • FM, Fibermax • HNR, height-to-node ratio • MC, mepiquat chloride • MPB, mepiquat pentaborate • NAWF, nodes above white flower • PGR, plant growth regulator

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication August 15, 2008.