Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 November 2008
Published in Agron J 100:1735-1739 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0013x
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moorman, T. B.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moorman, T. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singer, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moorman, T. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cover Crops
Right arrow Crop Systems

INTEGRATED AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS

Enhancing Nutrient Cycling by Coupling Cover Crops with Manure Injection

Jeremy W. Singer*, Cynthia A. Cambardella and Thomas B. Moorman

USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2110 University Blvd, Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (jeremy.singer{at}ars.usda.gov).

Coupling winter small grain cover crops (CC) with liquid manure injection may increase manure nutrient capture. The objectives of this research were to quantify manure injection effects using target swine (Sus scrofa) manure N rates of 112, 224, and 336 kg N ha–1 on CC plant density, fall and spring shoot biomass, N, P, and K uptake and subsequent corn (Zea mays L.) yield. A winter rye (Secale cereale L.)–oat (Avena sativa L.) CC was established before fall manure injection. Manure injection lowered mean CC plant density 25% because of CC mortality in the injection zone. Fall CC dry matter (DM) was 26% lower in the manure treatments than the no manure CC control, although no difference was detected for N (9.4 kg ha–1) or P (1.4 kg ha–1) uptake. No difference was detected for spring DM between CC no manure and manure treatments. Shoot DM, N, P, and K uptake increased 29, 41, 31, and 25% from the CC manure 112 to CC manure 224 with no increase above CC manure 224. Cover crop N uptake was higher in CC manure vs. no manure (60.1 vs. 35.6 kg ha–1). Cover crop P and K uptake were also higher in CC manure vs. no manure (9.2 vs. 6.6 kg P ha–1 and 41.3 vs. 30.0 kg K ha–1). Corn grain yield was unaffected by CC and responded positively to manure application (11,022 with manure vs. 9,845 kg ha–1 without manure). Coupling manure injection and cover crops can increase nutrient capture without lowering corn yield.

Abbreviations: CC, cover crop • DM, dry matter • LSNT, late spring nitrate test • M, manure treatment.

1 Mention of trade names or commercial products is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication July 10, 2008.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.