Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 August 2008
Published in Agron J 100:1396-1400 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0080F
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Evert, F. K.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Evert, F. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Evert, F. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Opinion
Right arrow Data Management

FORUM

Publishing Agronomic Data

Jeffrey W. Whitea,* and Frits K. van Evertb

a U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, 21881 N. Cardon Ln., Maricopa, AZ 85239 USA
b Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands

* Corresponding author (jeffrey.white{at}ars.usda.gov).

A typical agricultural experiment produces vastly more data than can be reproduced in a research paper. Thus, data provided in a paper often are not detailed enough to allow the analysis to be checked, nor can the data be reanalyzed, for example, by combining them with data from other experiments or by use of techniques developed long after the original paper was published. Limitations to reanalysis are particularly unfortunate because agricultural research increasingly deals with issues that require examining large or detailed sets of data. Journals increasingly favor publishing data in digital supplements because this improves the likelihood that papers will be cited while reducing the length of journal articles. In this paper we argue that formal methods for publishing datasets from agricultural research should be established, analogous to publishing research findings. Criteria for determining whether a dataset merits publication include originality, utility, significance, completeness, quality, and usability. Mechanisms for distributing datasets also merit attention. Ensuring long-term accessibility, respecting intellectual property rights, and managing possible corrections or modifications to datasets are among issues that require consideration.

Abbreviations: ICASA, International Consortium for Agricultural Systems Analysis

All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Received for publication March 13, 2008.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.